Re: return DECLINED or OK?

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > they usually > alter the uri then let the default apache trans handler do the mapping. btw, mapping uri to disk sources in apache2 was done in MapToStorageHandler rather than Trans handler, is it?

Re: return DECLINED or OK?

Thanks to all. That really be helpful.

Re: return DECLINED or OK?

J. Peng wrote: At what cases should we return a DECLINED or a OK from a handler? I saw the handler of PerlTransHandler returns a Apache2::Const::DECLINED but dont know why. see the introduction to part III here: http://www.modperlcookbook.org/chapters.html in general, trans handlers retur

Re: return DECLINED or OK?

J. Peng wrote: At what cases should we return a DECLINED or a OK from a handler? Depends on the request phase you are running under, and ultimately, it's dictated by apache [1] I saw the handler of PerlTransHandler returns a Apache2::Const::DECLINED but dont know why. In a nutshell, there a

return DECLINED or OK?

At what cases should we return a DECLINED or a OK from a handler? I saw the handler of PerlTransHandler returns a Apache2::Const::DECLINED but dont know why. thanks.

Re: Executing CGI programs from within mod_perl

Michael Peters wrote: Colin Wetherbee wrote: Basically, I'd like to run the 'mapserv' binary from within mod_perl Why? Don't you just want to sanitize the data? If so you can do that in a FixUpHandler or even in a separate handler that does an internal_redirect to the mapserv's url. I tried

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-1.31 RC3

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Issac Goldstand wrote: Steve Hay wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: win32 (xp sp2, vc6 - no SDK upgrade) - Apache 1.41 binary - ActivePerl 5.10 (build 1002) FAIL (sorry, folks) Segfault at startup. I wonder if this is caused by mis-matched CRTs? ActivePerl is built using

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-1.31 RC3

Issac Goldstand wrote: I'm reasonably sure that Apache's binaries are still being built with vc6, which is what prompted me to test this particular set of prerequisites (since binary Apache + binary ActivePerl will be the assumed building blocks for a binary PPM package to be installed upon)

Modify output of Apache::PerlRun?

Greetings, I'm running Apache 1.3.28 and mod_perl 1.27. I have quite a few Perl CGI scripts that run via Apache::PerlRun and product HTML output. I'd like to be able to modify the HTML output of these scripts after they finish running, so as to insert some HTML code on a site-wide basis without ha

Re: need to write a fitler based on request header

On Thu 28 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote: > Also I checked apache's official document for mod_rewrite: > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html Well, Apache 2.2 can, see http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritecond Other things you should be aware of: ... 4. %{HTTP:

Re: need to write a fitler based on request header

Hello Torsten, I have tested your rewrite syntax like below: RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{HTTP:Accept-Encoding} gzip [OR] RewriteCond %{HTTP:Accept-Encoding} deflate RewriteRule ^/unzip/(.*) /gziped/$1 [PT,L] Sorry it can't work. Also I checked apache's official document for

Re: need to write a fitler based on request header

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Torsten Foertsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu 28 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote: > > > currently I write it with PerlAccessHandler, it also works. is it > > right with this handler? > > Do you want to send a redirect to the browser (HTTP code 3xx)? I use apache's

Re: need to write a fitler based on request header

On Thu 28 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote: > currently I write it with PerlAccessHandler, it also works. is it > right with this handler? Do you want to send a redirect to the browser (HTTP code 3xx)? If yes then it can be done in an access handler as well. If you simply want to send the document in /pa

Re: need to write a fitler based on request header

thanks torsten. currently I write it with PerlAccessHandler, it also works. is it right with this handler? no, mod_rewrite can't rewrite requests based on Accept-Encoding header. On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Torsten Foertsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu 28 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote: > >

Re: need to write a fitler based on request header

On Thu 28 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote: > I need to write an input filter based on the request headers. > If request includes a "Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate" header, I > should redirect the request to /pathA. > If request doesn't include that header, I should redirect the request to > /pathB. (pathA

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-1.31 RC3

Steve Hay wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: win32 (xp sp2, vc6 - no SDK upgrade) - Apache 1.41 binary - ActivePerl 5.10 (build 1002) FAIL (sorry, folks) Segfault at startup. I wonder if this is caused by mis-matched CRTs? ActivePerl is built using VC6 (and therefore uses MSVCRT.dll).

RE: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-1.31 RC3

Issac Goldstand wrote: > win32 (xp sp2, vc6 - no SDK upgrade) - Apache 1.41 binary - > ActivePerl > 5.10 (build 1002) > FAIL > > (sorry, folks) > > Segfault at startup. I wonder if this is caused by mis-matched CRTs? ActivePerl is built using VC6 (and therefore uses MSVCRT.dll). You're also us

RE: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-1.31 RC3

Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > The mod_perl 1.31 release candidate 3 "Works with Perl 5.10" is > ready. It can be downloaded here: > > http://www.apache.org/~gozer/mp1/mod_perl-1.31-rc3.tar.gz All tests OK here: WinXP SP2, VC6 SP6, Apache 1.3.39 & Perl 5.10.0 (both built from source).