Re: [PATCH] END blocks may segfault

2010-06-30 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 09:50:00PM -0700, Fred Moyer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > > > Another option would be to copy/local() the array in > > modpler_perl_call_list.  Of course that still wont get it "right" > > because we wont run any newly defined subs... B

Re: [PATCH] END blocks may segfault

2010-06-30 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:49, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 09:50:00PM -0700, Fred Moyer wrote: >> I think getting rid of the segfault is a good thing.  But if the main >> problem is issues with NYTProf, then it seems like this change won't >> solve the core problem of autogenerated

Re: [PATCH] END blocks may segfault

2010-06-30 Thread Tim Bunce
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:24:42AM -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:49, Tim Bunce wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 09:50:00PM -0700, Fred Moyer wrote: > >> I think getting rid of the segfault is a good thing.  But if the main > >> problem is issues with NYTProf, then it s