On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:30 PM, wrote:
> Thank you – both Kevin and Ekki
>
> For my purposes I think Ekki’s idea sounds more like it could work.
>
> Ekki – would you know how to phrase that match in the negative?
> In other words, write a regex to match .jpeg, .doc, etc. etc.
> and if those
Thank you – both Kevin and Ekki
For my purposes I think Ekki’s idea sounds more like it could work.
Ekki – would you know how to phrase that match in the negative?
In other words, write a regex to match .jpeg, .doc, etc. etc.
and if those matches FAIL - then use perl handler?
Thanks again,
On 8/8/2012 2:13 PM, jniederber...@comcast.net wrote:
Hello,
I have a mod_perl program that is written to handle URL's that
name either a directory or *.html type files. All other types
I want Apache to just do its regular thing (e.g., serve image
type files, or .doc, .pdf, .js, .css, etc.)
What
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:13 PM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a mod_perl program that is written to handle URL's that
> name either a directory or *.html type files. All other types
> I want Apache to just do its regular thing (e.g., serve image
> type files, or .doc, .pdf, .js, .css, etc.)
> What's
Hello,
I have a mod_perl program that is written to handle URL's that
name either a directory or *.html type files. All other types
I want Apache to just do its regular thing (e.g., serve image
type files, or .doc, .pdf, .js, .css, etc.)
What's a good way to configure that? So for an entire web
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Randolf Richardson wrote:
>> I have not used modperl for long days. Is Apache mod_perl in actively
>> development recently? or just in maintenance state?
>
> It seems to me that it's quite active as a lot of people have been
> discussing some aspects of its
> I have not used modperl for long days. Is Apache mod_perl in actively
> development recently? or just in maintenance state?
It seems to me that it's quite active as a lot of people have been
discussing some aspects of its code.
The thing that's improtant to remember about ModP
