On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Andy Colson a...@squeakycode.net wrote:
On 02/16/2014 09:36 AM, Steve Hay wrote:
On 16 February 2014 15:11, Dominic Hargreaves d...@earth.li wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:10:20PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
Having just downloaded this latest SVN repo, a
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Steve Hay steve.m@googlemail.comwrote:
On 9 February 2014 05:49, Steve Baldwin steve.bald...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Not sure what I'm doing wrong here. I'm just trying to get the client ip
address in a PerlResponseHandler as follows:
:
use
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
I run a busy website algebra.com on a CentOS server.
Occasionally, apache processes crash with a segmentation fault.
I often get 140+ object requests per second, so isolating which request
caused segfault, by looking at
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Jim Schueler jschue...@eloquency.comwrote:
In light of Joe Schaefer's response, I appear to be outgunned. So, if
nothing else, can someone please clarify whether de-chunked means
re-assembled?
yes, where re-assembled means convert it back to the original data
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michiel Beijen michiel.bei...@otrs.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm using mod_perl 2.0.7 on Windows with Apache 2.2.23. I got Apache
from Apachelounge, and compiled mod_perl and perl 5.16.2 myself using
Visual Studio 2008. I'm using a 32-bit Windows Vista.
Pretty
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Michiel Beijen michiel.bei...@otrs.comwrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
mod_backtrace (http://emptyhammock.com/projects/httpd/diag/) may be a
shortcut to getting a backtrace. There's a binary for use with Apache
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:25 PM, silent silent2...@gmail.com wrote:
you have compiled and installed one apache, and you made it start at boot
time,
you must disable it or remove it ( do not let it start at boot time )
2011/5/18 Tom Kane t.k...@mindspring.com:
I tried to incorporate
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:36 PM, David david_6...@msn.com wrote:
If I haven't sent this to the correct place please inform me.
I've look through the assorted documentation, both mod_perl and Apache, and
haven't found a solution to my situation. I've also given the internet a try
with no luck.
2010/5/6 Torsten Förtsch torsten.foert...@gmx.net:
On Thursday 06 May 2010 13:53:37 tech_list wrote:
[ error] '/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs -q NOTEST_CPPFLAGS' failed:
[ error] Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at
/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs line 86.
Okay, I see. My apxs starts with
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Fred Moyer f...@redhotpenguin.com wrote:
Greetings,
Is anyone here attending ApacheCon in Oakland this year? I am
organizing a mod_perl social. I'll be at the conference at least one
day hacking mod_perl.
This lurker will be there.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Adriano Caloiaro acalo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
Could someone point me in the correct direction to support byte range
responses in mod_perl2? From what I've read, Apache should understand that
it needs to apply the byterange filter whenever $r-sendfile is
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Does somebody else care to share their opinion on this? Which of these
are okay?
- existing mod_perl releases
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Torsten Foertsch
torsten.foert...@gmx.netwrote:
On Fri 22 May 2009, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Hmmm, after trying to use what seems like a cool feature, I find that
mod_perl was never taught to use the Apache 2's mod_include plug-in
interface.
AFAIK
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:59 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
Having thought about this longer, I do agree that it would be reasonable
to provide OPT_INCNOEXEC as a noop integer for back-compat, but, it
turns out we're out of bits - allow_options_t is
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:59 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
Having thought about this longer, I do agree that it would be reasonable
to provide OPT_INCNOEXEC as a noop integer
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:10 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Backing up a bit...
I originally thought we could map bit values in 2.2.x to avoid affecting
modules, but that isn't possible since includes-with-exec is two bits
instead of one
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:15:00AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:17 AM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Tue May 12 13:17:29 2009
New Revision: 773881
URL: http
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Does somebody else care to share their opinion on this? Which of these
are okay?
- existing mod_perl releases (and potentially other third-party modules)
won't compile with 2.2.12
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:17 AM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Tue May 12 13:17:29 2009
New Revision: 773881
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=773881view=rev
Log:
backport 772997, 773322, 773342 from trunk.
Reviewed By: jorton, rpluem, covener
Security fix for
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Francois Pernet francois.per...@idsa.chwrote:
Hi,
We have received the following vulnerability report:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23192/info
I read the changes for the mod_perl versions but did not find anything
really clear. We are using mod_perl
The only issue I could see is if APR_WRITE was addeed
at some point somewhat recently, and this change would break
against older APRs.
APR_READ and/or APR_WRITE has been required since the first APR release.
Here's the logic to check for APR_READ/APR_WRITE back in 1999 (still called
ap_open at
21 matches
Mail list logo
