On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 22:50 -0500, David Nicol wrote:
> > In this specific case, Apache::Session has that name mostly by
> > coincidence. It could be called Tie::Hash::Persistent or something
> > similar with no loss of accuracy.
> >
> > - Perrin
>
> or "DirDB"
Or, quite possibly, Misc::Unmaint
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 16:50 +0200, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> I guess it could be that the use we make of Apache::Session is flawed,
> that we should call an update somewhere, but it works (apparently) with
> the other data stores. It feels like there is something in the
> direction of transactio
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 14:44, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2004, at 12:29 PM, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>
> > SourceForget is truly terrible and I would not burden the users with
> > the
> > horror of having to use it.
>
> We'd be happy to host a SCM rep
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 13:34, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> > I wasn't aware of these issues before. Looks like I'll have to use
> > BerkeleyDB or Tie::DB_Lock or something.
>
> On closer inspection I think it's mostly okay because the ses
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 09:31, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Chris Ochs wrote:
> > This must be my day... I am stress testing a new application that uses
> > apache::session with the DB_File backend store. When hitting it with apache
> > bench after a few hundred connections something with the db file g
On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 08:33, John Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is an oldbie question - i used to know something about mod_perl
> but haven't used it for so
> so long I've forgotten it all :)
>
> a mod_perl script i wrote quite some time ago has recently had
> increased "traffic". this has shown up
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 16:42, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Casey West wrote:
>
> > of work for the maintainer in working through the mailing list archives
>
> Or maintainer_s_. Why not set up an SF project for this? Then you and
> Enrico can both do work on it. There's no reason a
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 11:42, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 10:44, Enrico Sorcinelli wrote:
> > Wrapper or not, I think this is the moment to decide the future of
> > Apache::Session.
>
> I'm not sure it needs to happen right this minute, but I do have an idea
> of what I would like
I've released Apache::Session 1.6, which I had planned for New Year's
Day. Truly, it takes only a few minutes or at most a few hours to
apply, test, and release improvements and fixes. However, I simply
don't develop for the web any more. Therefore I've lost the itch that
Apache::Session used to
Apache::Session 1.6 has entered CPAN after 28 months of arduosly
ignoring all patches ;)
Changes in this edition include:
* Long-awaited fix for reversed file age test in File::clean()
* TableName parameter for Store/DBI and subclasses
* Improved Sybase support
* Informix support
* New tests (now
10 matches
Mail list logo
