Re: [mp2] Test failures with APR::Socket

2004-09-06 Thread cw
Stas Bekman wrote: for the future, your report misses several important parts. In the future please make sure to read: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ before submitting a report. Also since all the errors are identical we prefer an inlined report with just one test. My apologies, I did actually go

Re: [mp2] Test failures with APR::Socket

2004-09-06 Thread cw
Oops, I thought the earlier one had gotten lost due to my having the wrong email as sender. Ignore the earlier and go to the latter as I have updated for when I left echo_filter running over lunch. Looks like another issue with the BSDs as I'm running OpenBSD and I see someone posting a similar

[mp2] Test failures with APR::Socket

2004-09-06 Thread cw
Hey folks, After a little delay due to other work getting in the way I'm back with more questions. Make test is bailing out in a few places. Rather than dump all the outputs here I've put them on my webspace: http://www.fidei.co.uk/files/mod_perl/ Key points to note here: For some reason, echo_t

[mp2] Test failures with APR::Socket

2004-09-06 Thread cw
Hey folks, After a little delay due to other work getting in the way I'm back with more questions. Make test is bailing out in a few places. Rather than dump all the outputs here I've put them on my webspace: http://www.fidei.co.uk/files/mod_perl/ Key points to note here: For some reason, echo_t

Re: [mp2] Known problem with mod_perl 1.99_16 on FreeBSD 5 ?

2004-09-06 Thread cw
Gmake works on OpenBSD 3.5 as well. Just need to iron out the test failures that happen regardless of make/gmake. -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html

Re: [mp2] NetBSD-1.6.2 modperl snapshot build error

2004-08-27 Thread cw
Hi there folks, Jumping in on this one a little late but I've been having the same problem. Software: Apache 2.0.50 Perl: 5.8.5 Modperl: 1.9916 OS: OpenBSD 3.5 I get exactly the same error however when commenting out the lines as suggested for the previous incident make bails out with the followi