> If the parent post is considered on-topic, why would you want to
> discourage discussion, even if it becomes a wee bit tangential?
job listings for specific positions that involve mod_perl have traditionally
been very welcome here - provided the message is for a real position by
someone willing
Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Guys, I understand that you're interested in discussing the dynamics of
> programming teams and hiring approaches, but it really isn't on-topic
> for this list. It isn't even specifically about Perl. Maybe one of you
> could start a thread on http://discuss.joelonsoftware.
Guys, I understand that you're interested in discussing the dynamics of
programming teams and hiring approaches, but it really isn't on-topic
for this list. It isn't even specifically about Perl. Maybe one of you
could start a thread on http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/?biz and post
the URL here
Ian D. Stewart wrote:
> It has been my personal experience that alot of the design
> breakthroughs happen as a direct result of informal conversations in
> the hallways, around the watercooler, in the smoking area, etc. This
> sort of dynamic interaction just isn't possible in a telecommute
>
Not just being outsourced. But I don't think even with today's
technologies you can create better team dynamics than in physical
presence with the rest of the guys. Unless you are a super programmer
who can change the world just by being in the basement 8x5, team play
(not just with the co-deve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I am amazed by the technology companies that think that programming
> requires physical presence in the 21st century. Yeesh.
I'm all for it. Among other good reasons, requiring a physical presence
is a great insurance against being outsourced.
-
Ian D. Stewart wrote:
Dodger wrote:
If you're unwilling to let a programmer telecommute, you're still in the
dark ages, and I wouldn't want to work for you anyway.
I am amazed by the technology companies that think that programming
requires physical presence in the 21st century. Yeesh.
Th
Dodger wrote:
If you're unwilling to let a programmer telecommute, you're still in the
dark ages, and I wouldn't want to work for you anyway.
I am amazed by the technology companies that think that programming
requires physical presence in the 21st century. Yeesh.
This is only true if you r
If you're unwilling to let a programmer telecommute, you're still in the
dark ages, and I wouldn't want to work for you anyway.
I am amazed by the technology companies that think that programming
requires physical presence in the 21st century. Yeesh.
--
Dodger
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Sam Tregar wro
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Weird, read it twice and missed that. Must be all the training to ignore
all-caps in email =)
mfp
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 16:57 -0500, Gedanken wrote:
> What city? Telecommute? Travel Percentage?
It does say "NEW YORK CITY AREA ONLY" in the very f
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 16:57 -0500, Gedanken wrote:
> What city? Telecommute? Travel Percentage?
It does say "NEW YORK CITY AREA ONLY" in the very first line...
- Perrin
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Perrin Harkins wrote:
What city? Telecommute? Travel Percentage?
gedanken
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 17:24 -0400, Sam Tregar wrote:
> Plus Three is looking for an experienced Perl programmer to join our
> team.
P.S. This is where I work too. We'd love to get some more mod
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 17:24 -0400, Sam Tregar wrote:
> Plus Three is looking for an experienced Perl programmer to join our
> team.
P.S. This is where I work too. We'd love to get some more mod_perl
people on the team.
- Perrin
NEW YORK CITY AREA ONLY
Plus Three is looking for an experienced Perl programmer to join our
team. You will join a large-scale, high-visibility project with the
potential to positively affect the future of the Democratic party
during the next election cycle.
We're looking for someone who enjoys p
14 matches
Mail list logo
