MJH wrote:
On Friday 28 May 2004 01:36 pm, Stas Bekman wrote:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/api/APR/Date.html
Are these parsers any faster than the perl module ones? (Ie. any reason
for using these over Date::Time or similar?)
They are written in C, so if Date::Time is not, APR::Date is probabl
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 18:31, MJH wrote:
> So, assuming the date you have is either HTTP-compliant or RFC822-compliant,
> then the APR::Date functions are orders of magnitude faster.
>
> Hopefully this is of use to someone.
It is, thanks. APR::Base64 and APR::URI look pretty useful too.
- Perri
On Friday 28 May 2004 01:36 pm, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >>http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/api/APR/Date.html
> > Are these parsers any faster than the perl module ones? (Ie. any reason
> > for using these over Date::Time or similar?)
>
> They are written in C, so if Date::Time is not, APR::Date is pr
Hi,
As we have mentioned several times on this list mod_perl 2.0 will be released
when a selected API will be reviewed, tested and documented and the release
todo file http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/modperl-2.0/todo/release gets emptied.
This is the first installment of getting to the final goal
