Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Andy == Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone heard from James Freeman, the maintainer of CGI::Simple
(http://search.cpan.org/dist/Cgi-Simple/)? It's not been updated in a
couple of years, the outstanding bugs appear to mostly be related to
the
On 16 Jan 2007, at 16:09, JupiterHost.Net wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Andy == Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone heard from James Freeman, the maintainer of CGI::Simple
(http://search.cpan.org/dist/Cgi-Simple/)? It's not been
updated in a
couple of years, the
Why would anyone use this instead of CGI.pm?
I like it because:
- uploads are handled more intuitively IMHO
- no HTML stuff (although CGI's HTML methods are pretty slick)
- no function/method oddness
Not sure about its mod_perl issues, I use it mostly under persistent
perl as anormal
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Has anyone heard from James Freeman, the maintainer of CGI::Simple
(http://search.cpan.org/dist/Cgi-Simple/)? It's not been updated
in a
couple of years, the outstanding bugs appear to mostly be related to
the same issue, and I tried emailing him about this using the
On 16 Jan 2007, at 16:25, Jiří Pavlovský wrote:
I use it too. In CGI::Application run under Registry. I had to make
few changes for it to run under mp2 IIRC.
Do you still have those changes? I'd be interested to see a diff
against the released version if possible.
--
Andy Armstrong,
Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 16 Jan 2007, at 16:25, Jiří Pavlovský wrote:
I use it too. In CGI::Application run under Registry. I had to make
few changes for it to run under mp2 IIRC.
Do you still have those changes? I'd be interested to see a diff
against the released version if possible.
On 16 Jan 2007, at 16:45, Jiří Pavlovský wrote:
Do you still have those changes? I'd be interested to see a diff
against the released version if possible.
Those were just Apache - Apache2 renaming issues.
OK, I think I got all those, thanks.
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
On 10 Jan 2007, at 17:19, Mark Stosberg wrote:
I still like the CGI::Simple is lighter weight, but it just didn't
work
well enough for me. (I'm sorry my memory doesn't recall the exact
issues
anymore... it may have been related to file uploading.)
Ring any bells?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks,
On the Perl Modules Authors list yesterday Ovid wrote:
Has anyone heard from James Freeman, the maintainer of CGI::Simple
(http://search.cpan.org/dist/Cgi-Simple/)? It's not been updated in a
couple of years, the outstanding bugs appear
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 10 Jan 2007, at 17:13, Michael Peters wrote:
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Part of my reason for posting is to try and work out whether anyone's
actually using it.
I'd say the user's of it on this list would be pretty
small. But I've heard it's
On 10 Jan 2007, at 17:58, Randy Kobes wrote:
I started here because the bugs related to it not working with
mod_perl. So I figured I'd, you know, ask mod_perl people :)
One place to perhaps start is the mod_perl tests. In
particular, one could switch the t/modules/cgi*.t
tests (and
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 14:12 +, Andy Armstrong wrote:
It turns out the main bugs he's referring to are:
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=23519 new modperl breaks
API again
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=11896 parameters missing
with latest mod_perl
Maybe I'm just
12 matches
Mail list logo
