Re: [mp1] [bug report] Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-31 Thread Clayton Cottingham
Stas: sorry i did miss that, yesterday was too too hectic ill try this now On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 20:03, Stas Bekman wrote: > Clayton Cottingham wrote: > > yah its calling it properly: > > > > my $apr = Apache::Request->new( > > shift, > > POST_MAX=> 10 * 1024 * 1024,

Re: [mp1] [bug report] Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Clayton Cottingham wrote: yah its calling it properly: my $apr = Apache::Request->new( shift, POST_MAX=> 10 * 1024 * 1024,# in bytes, so 10M DISABLE_UPLOADS => 0 ); how would one make a test to make sure the file is uploading properly? and what about multip

Re: [mp1] [bug report] Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-29 Thread Clayton Cottingham
yah its calling it properly: my $apr = Apache::Request->new( shift, POST_MAX=> 10 * 1024 * 1024,# in bytes, so 10M DISABLE_UPLOADS => 0 ); how would one make a test to make sure the file is uploading properly? and what about multipart form? ##how to pos

Re: [mp1] [bug report] Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Clayton Cottingham wrote: ok thanks for the patience! i managed to a) get the base bug report template to go under freebsd and good. b) had my modules fail and generate error log which is telling me that this isnt correct: my $apr = Apache::Request->new( shift, POST_MAX

Re: [mp1] [bug report] Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-29 Thread Stas Bekman
[please keep on the list, thanks] Clayton Cottingham wrote: hey stas! > how can i set them into the httpd.conf? They are inherited from your global httpd.conf this is what i need in i think! LoadModule status_module modules/mod_status.so LoadModule info_modulemodules/mod_info.so

Re: [mp1] [bug report] Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-29 Thread Clayton Cottingham
ok thanks for the patience! i managed to a) get the base bug report template to go under freebsd and b) had my modules fail and generate error log which is telling me that this isnt correct: my $apr = Apache::Request->new( shift, POST_MAX=> 10 * 1024 * 1024,# in

Re: [mp1] [bug report] Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Clayton Cottingham wrote: oops! i just checked the bug.t wasnt safed after i put the changes in to use PP/* modules, that should work ok right? i include it with changes that same file was included in the original tar. sorry for the fud also i injected the pp.conf into extra.conf.in sio there is

Re: [mp1] [bug report] Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-29 Thread Clayton Cottingham
oops! i just checked the bug.t wasnt safed after i put the changes in to use PP/* modules, that should work ok right? i include it with changes sorry for the fud also i injected the pp.conf into extra.conf.in sio there is no need to include it there is nothing nessecary in my startup.pl file th

Re: [mp1] [bug report] Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Clayton Cottingham wrote: Hello: here is as much information on this as i have currently the test suite was blowing up on both freebsd and linux for different reasons, its all in the error report doc i guess at this point the only thing left is to try and compile apache/mod-perl from scratch.. bu

[mp1] [bug report] Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-29 Thread Clayton Cottingham
Hello: here is as much information on this as i have currently the test suite was blowing up on both freebsd and linux for different reasons, its all in the error report doc i guess at this point the only thing left is to try and compile apache/mod-perl from scratch.. but i dont have time for th

Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Clayton Cottingham wrote: stas, thanks again, i owe you another espresso! ;) ok it seems there is some sort of disconnect with modperl , the apr->upload and method postm, at least in my brainpan! as the listing are it does not pass the %args to the parseFile or through to the listing 2 subroutine

Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-27 Thread Clayton Cottingham
thanks for the reply here is something strange. i cant figure out based on all this, under mod perl 1 Apache/1.3.29 on FreeBSD devserver.ppw 5.1-RELEASE below is a small piece of my module the 'parsefile' subroutine *does not* print out %args, i dont understand why not can someone explain? **

Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-27 Thread Clayton Cottingham
stas, thanks again, i owe you another espresso! ok it seems there is some sort of disconnect with modperl , the apr->upload and method postm, at least in my brainpan! as the listing are it does not pass the %args to the parseFile or through to the listing 2 subroutine if the $apr and if statemen

Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Clayton Cottingham wrote: thanks for the reply here is something strange. i cant figure out based on all this, under mod perl 1 Apache/1.3.29 on FreeBSD devserver.ppw 5.1-RELEASE below is a small piece of my module the 'parsefile' subroutine *does not* print out %args, i dont understand why not

Re: Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-26 Thread Stas Bekman
Clayton Cottingham wrote: while i understand the difference between these two i am unsure how to handle these back and forth. let me explain: There are not the same thing. I have an upload module with the handler using an Apache::Request my $r = Apache::Request->new( shift, POST

Apache::Request vs Apache->request

2004-01-21 Thread Clayton Cottingham
while i understand the difference between these two i am unsure how to handle these back and forth. let me explain: I have an upload module with the handler using an Apache::Request my $r = Apache::Request->new( shift, POST_MAX=> 10 * 1024 * 1024,# in bytes, so 10M