Re: DESTROY not called on some form of recurrence

2004-07-10 Thread Wouter van Vliet
> > Hi Wouter, > > Did you check the manual[1]? This reference is for Apache::PerlRun but > it may give you some ideas of why you're seeing that behavior. > > > Good luck, > William > > [1] http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/porting.html#Apache__PerlRun__a_closer_look > Thank you very muc

Re: DESTROY not called on some form of recurrence

2004-07-10 Thread Wouter van Vliet
Quoting Wouter van Vliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hi Wouter, > > > > Did you check the manual[1]? This reference is for Apache::PerlRun but > > it may give you some ideas of why you're seeing that behavior. > > > > > > Good luck, > > William > > > > [1] > http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/

Re: DESTROY not called on some form of recurrence

2004-07-10 Thread William McKee
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 11:33:44AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Oops, think I should have told ya something more on why I think DESTROY is not > handled. Well, that's very easy to say: The lines printed to STDERR from within > the DESTROY function do not appear in my error_log. Though this: H

Re: DESTROY not called on some form of recurrence

2004-07-10 Thread lists
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Hi Fella's, > (..) > > Oops, think I should have told ya something more on why I think DESTROY is not handled. Well, that's very easy to say: The lines printed to STDERR from within the DESTROY function do not appear in my error_log. Though this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] li

DESTROY not called on some form of recurrence

2004-07-10 Thread lists
Hi Fella's, I'm new to this list, starting of with a question and hoping to be answering to other's.. The problem I encounter is kinda strange to me. It seems as if my objects are no longer being DESTROY'ed as soon as I have an Object (o1), that has an Object (o2) for one of his properties which