>
> Hi Wouter,
>
> Did you check the manual[1]? This reference is for Apache::PerlRun but
> it may give you some ideas of why you're seeing that behavior.
>
>
> Good luck,
> William
>
> [1]
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/porting.html#Apache__PerlRun__a_closer_look
>
Thank you very muc
Quoting Wouter van Vliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Hi Wouter,
> >
> > Did you check the manual[1]? This reference is for Apache::PerlRun but
> > it may give you some ideas of why you're seeing that behavior.
> >
> >
> > Good luck,
> > William
> >
> > [1]
>
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 11:33:44AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oops, think I should have told ya something more on why I think DESTROY is not
> handled. Well, that's very easy to say: The lines printed to STDERR from within
> the DESTROY function do not appear in my error_log. Though this:
H
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi Fella's,
>
(..)
>
>
Oops, think I should have told ya something more on why I think DESTROY is not
handled. Well, that's very easy to say: The lines printed to STDERR from within
the DESTROY function do not appear in my error_log. Though this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] li
Hi Fella's,
I'm new to this list, starting of with a question and hoping to be answering to
other's..
The problem I encounter is kinda strange to me. It seems as if my objects are no
longer being DESTROY'ed as soon as I have an Object (o1), that has an Object
(o2) for one of his properties which