Re: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers)

2010-07-19 Thread Michael Ludwig
Michael Ludwig schrieb am 09.07.2010 um 22:16 (+0200): > Are there any people on this list using mod_perl 2.0 on Windows? > Do you have any positive or negative experiences to share? Folks, thanks for your input on using mod_perl on Windows. The bottom line to draw based on your feedback seems to

Re: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers)

2010-07-13 Thread Jacek Pasternak
ubject: Re: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers) Perrin Harkins schrieb am 09.07.2010 um 13:19 (-0400): > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote: > > What's the status of using mod_perl on Windows? > > http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/os/win32/i

RE: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers)

2010-07-13 Thread Dami Laurent (PJ)
>-Message d'origine- >De : Michael Ludwig [mailto:mil...@gmx.de] >Envoyé : vendredi, 9. juillet 2010 22:16 >À : modperl@perl.apache.org >Objet : Re: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers) > ... >Relevant or not, this story makes me ask the following

Re: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers)

2010-07-13 Thread Michael Lackhoff
On 09.07.2010 22:16 Michael Ludwig wrote: > Relevant or not, this story makes me ask the following questions: > Are there any people on this list using mod_perl 2.0 on Windows? > Do you have any positive or negative experiences to share? I use it for a web based application but have/had some prob

Re: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers)

2010-07-12 Thread Thomas den Braber
@perl.apache.org Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 22:16:23 +0200 Subject: Re: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers) > Perrin Harkins schrieb am 09.07.2010 um 13:19 (-0400): > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Michael Ludwig > wrote: > > > > What's the status of using mod_p

Re: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers)

2010-07-10 Thread Vincent Veyron
Le vendredi 09 juillet 2010 à 22:16 +0200, Michael Ludwig a écrit : > Are there any people on this list using mod_perl 2.0 on Windows? > Do you have any positive or negative experiences to share? > I have used mod_perl on Windows on bare metal and in a Virtual Machine, for the app in my sig. The

Re: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers)

2010-07-09 Thread André Warnier
Michael Ludwig wrote: ... Relevant or not, this story makes me ask the following questions: Are there any people on this list using mod_perl 2.0 on Windows? Do you have any positive or negative experiences to share? I use quite a bit of mod_perl under Linux/Apache 2.x/mod_perl 2.x, and have a f

Re: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers)

2010-07-09 Thread Michael Ludwig
Perrin Harkins schrieb am 09.07.2010 um 13:19 (-0400): > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote: > > What's the status of using mod_perl on Windows? > > http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/os/win32/install.html Thanks. Doesn't sound too bad. So it's (1) ActiveState, (2) one of the Al

Re: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers)

2010-07-09 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote: > Googling for mod_perl and Windows, one of the most prominent hits is > this page from the mod_perl book, which might be somewhat outdated: That book was published in 2003 and is about apache 1 and mod_perl 1. If that's what you're using, th

Re: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers)

2010-07-09 Thread Michael Ludwig
0/6/21 > Subject: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers) > To: win32-vani...@perl.org > For sample setup see > http://strawberryperl.com/package/kmx/mod_perl/README-512.TXT Googling for mod_perl and Windows, one of the most prominent hits is this page from the mod_perl book,

Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers)

2010-07-02 Thread Michiel Beijen
To all of you Windows & mod_perl lovers that might be on this list but not on win32-vanilla, this might be really interesting. -- Mike -- Forwarded message -- From: kmx Date: 2010/6/21 Subject: Strawberry perl + mod_perl (call for testers) To: win32-vani...@perl.org To an