Hi John,
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 10:17 -0500, John Deighan wrote:
However, we're also not sure if either of these are needed to escape the
2 GB memory limitation. E.g., can 64 bit Perl be used with a 32 bit
Apache and/or mod_perl?
You should use the same architecture for Perl and Apache.
Any
Hi
Am 27.01.2011 um 12:57 schrieb Michiel Beijen michiel.bei...@otrs.com:
Hi John,
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 10:17 -0500, John Deighan wrote:
However, we're also not sure if either of these are needed to escape the
2 GB memory limitation. E.g., can 64 bit Perl be used with a 32 bit
Apache
I'd forgotten about Strawberry Perl (came across it about a year ago, but never got around to trying
it). One question, though: I'm thinking there's not much point to using a 64-bit version of mod_perl
unless I'm using it with a 64-bit version of Apache. Where can I get a 64-bit version of
Hi John,
On Thu, January 27, 2011 15:10, John Deighan wrote:
One question, though: I'm thinking there's not much point to using a
64-bit version of mod_perl
unless I'm using it with a 64-bit version of Apache. Where can I get a
64-bit version of Apache that
will with with the mod_perl below?
On 26 Jan 2011, at 15:17, John Deighan wrote:
What we would like is to run this application in a 64 bit environment, thus
allowing us to use more than the 2 GB memory that the Apache process ('httpd')
is limited to (the Out of memory errors always occur as the memory usage
of the httpd
On 01/27/2011 07:05 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Can I just say: WTF? 2G in an Apache? Surely there's a better way of
architecting
this?
One thing to remember is that he's running Windows which doesn't have
Copy-On-Write memory, so depending on what he's doing it might not take
up as much
Michael Peters schrieb am 27.01.2011 um 19:14 (-0500):
But, even after all that I have applications where we consistently
run 3-4G just for mod_perl/Apache.
But surely not in one process as the OP said he'd like to do?
--
Michael Ludwig
On 01/27/2011 07:41 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
Michael Peters schrieb am 27.01.2011 um 19:14 (-0500):
But, even after all that I have applications where we consistently
run 3-4G just for mod_perl/Apache.
But surely not in one process as the OP said he'd like to do?
No you're right, but I'm
On 1/27/2011 7:16 PM, Michael Peters wrote:
On 01/27/2011 07:41 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
Michael Peters schrieb am 27.01.2011 um 19:14 (-0500):
But, even after all that I have applications where we consistently
run 3-4G just for mod_perl/Apache.
But surely not in one process as the OP said
We have an Apache/mod_perl application running under Windows Server 2003
that periodically experiences
Out of memory errors (they appear in the Apache error logs) which
forces Apache to restart. Our application does, in fact, use a lot of
memory, and we believe that this is not due to a bug or
10 matches
Mail list logo
