On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:20:28 +0100
Clinton Gormley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > mod_perl has an excellent document. but is there a
> > checklist kind of thing for running mod_perl in
> > environment like this? where can i read more about
> > this?
>
> Not that I know of, but if you just think o
> thanks! I actually have an example of this. A module
> for event logging purpose. the global variable is a
> hash consists a set of default log flags corresponding
> to log messages.
>
> i can register a new flag/msg to the global variable
> in my app and go on with the logging. a simplified
>
--- Clinton Gormley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > we are exploring the idea of writing medium to
> large
> > Perl apps in the future which will require
> mod_perl.
> > the current environment is apache 1.3. having
> read
> > modperl's doc and i am concerned about running
> > multiple unrelated
On 3/16/07, James. L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
any special setup for mod_perl 1 + apache 1 under
virtual host? it works but my impression is that it is
hard to setup and must be coded very carefully.
It's not hard to setup, and it doesn't require any special coding
practices beyond any other l
On Mar 16, 2007, at 11:55 AM, James. L wrote:
any special setup for mod_perl 1 + apache 1 under
virtual host? it works but my impression is that it is
hard to setup and must be coded very carefully.
that's probably the reason why i rarely see mod_perl
offered in share dhosting environment.
n
--- John Saylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as far as running multiple unrelated perl apps using
> mod_perl- i think
> it happens every day! you just need to program them
> accordingly. also,
> you can use virtual hosts under apache 1.3.x too.
>
> if you use appropriate naming for db handles, th
--- Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
> "James. L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > mod_perl 2 seems solve the problem with virtual
> host
> > which will require us to adopt apache 2 and use
> > virtual host.
> >
> > my understanding may be false
> we are exploring the idea of writing medium to large
> Perl apps in the future which will require mod_perl.
> the current environment is apache 1.3. having read
> modperl's doc and i am concerned about running
> multiple unrelated mod_perl apps on one server, such
> as 2 or 3 medium Perl apps. (
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
"James. L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mod_perl 2 seems solve the problem with virtual host
> which will require us to adopt apache 2 and use
> virtual host.
>
> my understanding may be false but i would like to hear
> your point of view and help me figur
You should not develop anything new in mod_perl / Apache 1.3
That system is outdated and only receives bugfixes.
Use mp2/Apache2
the environment currently being mp1 is meaningless. mp apps often
work best on their on server, but that doesn't mean a physical
server: run apache2 on an altern
hi
i'd encourage you to look into mod_perl as it can be amazing in letting
you get the most out of your hardware.
as far as running multiple unrelated perl apps using mod_perl- i think
it happens every day! you just need to program them accordingly. also,
you can use virtual hosts under apache 1
hello,
i am doing a little research on adopting Perl into our
dev group.
we are a small team (8) that mostly programming in
Java . since half of the team has a little or ok
knowlege of Perl, we have been experimenting Perl in
smaller projects to avoid a lot of java related
overhead. most of our
12 matches
Mail list logo
