On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Lionel MARTIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To be honest, I'm running Apache, mod_perl and DBI under Win32 (+Mason) and
I can't complain about it.
I'd like to test and compare with LAMP to see what's the best (in term of
speed and memory managament), but
Lionel MARTIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be honest, I'm running Apache, mod_perl and DBI under Win32 (+Mason) and
> I can't complain about it.
>
> I'd like to test and compare with LAMP to see what's the best (in term of
> speed and memory managament), but what you told me made me jump, thi
Lionel MARTIN wrote:
To be honest, I'm running Apache, mod_perl and DBI under Win32 (+Mason)
and I can't complain about it.
I'd like to test and compare with LAMP to see what's the best (in term
of speed and memory managament), but what you told me made me jump,
thinking "Am I doing a mistake
e Yarrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: mod_perl make test failed tests
Lionel MARTIN wrote:
I saw that in DBI docs, but I just thought this piece of info was a bit
dated. But, now, you're saying the same.
Does this mean that you would not use an
Lionel MARTIN wrote:
I saw that in DBI docs, but I just thought this piece of info was a bit
dated. But, now, you're saying the same.
Does this mean that you would not use any Win32 platform for production,
as Win32 Apache MPMs are threaded, and Win32 Perl distributions compiled
with ithreads e
Hi all,
This post is not related to the main topic, but Philip, you said:
I think DBI seems to be making progress on CLONE() ing $dbh handles, at
least from the test results I got/saw over on dbi-dev (at) perl (dot) org
for the 1.51-RC1 just posted. Its docs still say not to use DBI with
ith
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
I think DBI seems to be making progress on CLONE() ing $dbh handles, at
least from the test results I got/saw over on dbi-dev (at) perl (dot)
org for the 1.51-RC1 just posted. Its docs still say not to use DBI
with ithread enabled perl in production, so I'd go with th
Maurice Yarrow wrote:
Hello Philip
Thanks for your reply, which was very reassuring, actually.
Excellent!
By the way, my perl5.8.3 is built for i386-linux-thread-multi,
but my 5.8.8, which is what I built the mod_perl.so with,
is built for i686-linux. Two questions, then:
Is the non-thread
Hello Philip
Thanks for your reply, which was very reassuring, actually.
By the way, my perl5.8.3 is built for i386-linux-thread-multi,
but my 5.8.8, which is what I built the mod_perl.so with,
is built for i686-linux. Two questions, then:
Is the non-threaded perl5.8.8 / mod_perl combination t
Maurice Yarrow wrote:
t/apache/content_length_header.t 271 3.70% 17
t/api/status.t 62 33.33% 4-5
These are fixed in SVN. You assume correctly. httpd backported/changed
from functionality in 2.1.x to 2.0.56.. Just tests themselves need
Hello mod_perl community
Environment:
FC1,
apache2.0.58,
perl5.8.8,
mod_perl2.0.2.
I am getting some failed tests during the "make test" for mod_perl 2.0.2,
in particular:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of
Failed
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
