Re: what is difference with static and DSO mod_perl ?

2005-12-21 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
This is the main difference: DSO: you need those 2 lines there's a negligible speed/memory overhead. you'd barely notice it if you ran some severe benchmarking tests when mod_perl is updated, you just recompile the mod_perl module Static: you don't use those 2 lines

Re: what is difference with static and DSO mod_perl ?

2005-12-20 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, LUKE wrote: How to setup httpd.conf ? when i using static (non-DSO) mod_perl. DSO mod_perl httpd.conf === LoadModule perl_module modules/mod_perl.so Don't need that... See httpd -l PerlRequire "/usr/local/perlmods/startfile.pl" IF this is mp2, use PerlPostCo

Re: what is difference with static and DSO mod_perl ?

2005-12-20 Thread Chase Venters
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 01:17 am, LUKE wrote: > Will i need recomplie apache when i modify my (perl)code , when using > non-DSO mod_perl? No. Static mod_perl simply means that the mod_perl module that runs your Perl code is compiled in as part of Apache itself, rather than being a runtime ex

what is difference with static and DSO mod_perl ?

2005-12-19 Thread LUKE
How to setup httpd.conf ? when i using static (non-DSO) mod_perl. DSO mod_perl httpd.conf === LoadModule perl_module modules/mod_perl.so PerlRequire "/usr/local/perlmods/startfile.pl" Will i need recomplie apache when i modify my (perl)code , when using non-DSO mod_perl?