Is there a way to force apache to stay in memory. My linux box swaps
children out (shown in brackets in ps) during long periods of low
activity, and swapping them back in is causing latency for my users.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl
Hi there,
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Mark Maunder wrote:
> Is there a way to force apache to stay in memory.
Don't mount the swap space?
73,
Ged.
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/mail
I've considered it, but I have a few other processes that I'd like to
swap out when they're inactive to increase disk cache etc. btw, I've
managed to lock mysql into memory on the server using the memlock config
option which uses mlockall. I've googled myself to death but can't find
anything about
Hello again,
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Mark Maunder wrote:
> > Don't mount the swap space?
> I've considered it, but I have a few other processes that I'd like to
> swap out
If I read you right, this only happens when your Apache processes are
inactive for some time. So why not set up a process whi
Mark Maunder wrote:
I've considered it, but I have a few other processes that I'd like to
swap out when they're inactive to increase disk cache etc. btw, I've
managed to lock mysql into memory on the server using the memlock config
option which uses mlockall. I've googled myself to death but can't
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 12:43, Ged Haywood wrote:
> If I read you right, this only happens when your Apache processes are
> inactive for some time. So why not set up a process which keeps them
> active, like a kind of watchdog? It would be very simple using LWP or
> something like that.
Definite
Hello again,
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Mark Maunder wrote:
> I could blast the server with ap every 10 minutes.
Or every 10 seconds.
> But it's not too elegant in that not all apache children are guaranteed
> to serve requests, so some will stay in swap.
They will if you make them die after serving
Hi Mark,
What version of CGI.pm are you testing with? There are some known
problems with using CGI.pm and mod_perl in older versions of CGI.pm.
Upgrade to the latest version of CGI.pm and my guess is your problem
will go away.
Cheers,
Cees
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Hello,
I maintain the popular
On 2004-02-29, Cees Hek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> What version of CGI.pm are you testing with? There are some known
> problems with using CGI.pm and mod_perl in older versions of CGI.pm.
> Upgrade to the latest version of CGI.pm and my guess is your problem
> will go away.
Cees
Mark Maunder wrote:
Definitely an option. I could blast the server with ap every 10 minutes.
But it's not too elegant in that not all apache children are guaranteed
to serve requests, so some will stay in swap.
Why not send them a meaningless signal? It'd force the kernel to bring
them back to 'ha
Mark Maunder wrote:
Is there a way to force apache to stay in memory. My linux box swaps
children out (shown in brackets in ps) during long periods of low
activity, and swapping them back in is causing latency for my users.
Take a look at these threads, which discuss this exact topic:
http://marc.t
> "Mark" == Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> Is there a way to force apache to stay in memory. My linux box swaps
Mark> children out (shown in brackets in ps) during long periods of low
Mark> activity, and swapping them back in is causing latency for my users.
Post a URL for you
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 29 Feb 2004,
Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm assuming the httpd processes are in swap, because according to
> the ps docs, processes surrounded by [square brackets] are swapped
> out. But I think ps might be lying because as soon as I start
> apache, the p
Thanks. I think the idea of sending a useless signal is the best so far.
I'm also going to upgrade my kernel and see if I can get more meaningful
output from ps.
btw, is anyone using the 2.6 kernel on live servers yet?
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 12:50, Render Web wrote:
> Mark Maunder wrote:
> > I've
14 matches
Mail list logo
