> >
> > Hi !!!
> >
> > Just a question but what is the right version of RPM for SSLeay.
> >
> > On ftp.replay.com you got :
> >
> > SSLeay-0.9.0b-4.i386.rpm
> > SSLeay-devel-0.9.0b-4.i386.rpm
> > SSLeay-0.9.0b-4.src.rpm
> >
> > and also
> >
> > SSLeay-0.9.0b-3.i386.rpm
> > SSLeay-devel-0.9.0
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> Hi !!!
>
> Just a question but what is the right version of RPM for SSLeay.
>
> On ftp.replay.com you got :
>
> SSLeay-0.9.0b-4.i386.rpm
> SSLeay-devel-0.9.0b-4.i386.rpm
> SSLeay-0.9.0b-4.src.rpm
>
> and also
>
> SSLeay-0.9.0b-3.i386.rpm
> SSLeay-devel-0.9.0b-3.i386.rp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Just uploaded to ftp://ftp.replay.com/pub/replay/incoming !!!
Name: pkcs12 Distribution: (none)
Version : 053b Vendor: (none)
Release : 0 Build Date: Tue Feb 9
14:58:
Hi !!!
Just a question but what is the right version of RPM for SSLeay.
On ftp.replay.com you got :
SSLeay-0.9.0b-4.i386.rpm
SSLeay-devel-0.9.0b-4.i386.rpm
SSLeay-0.9.0b-4.src.rpm
and also
SSLeay-0.9.0b-3.i386.rpm
SSLeay-devel-0.9.0b-3.i386.rpm
SSLeay-0.9.0b-3.src.rpm
+---
On Tue, Feb 09, 1999, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> > As a start you can look at the pkg.contrib/mca.sh script in the mod_ssl
> > distribution (it creates a CA cert and one or more client certs signed by
> > it). Then look at the pkcs12 program from Stephen Henson (you can find a
> > link to it under the
> As a start you can look at the pkg.contrib/mca.sh script in the
> mod_ssl
> distribution (it creates a CA cert and one or more client certs signed
> by it).
> Then look at the pkcs12 program from Stephen Henson (you can find a
> link to it
> under the Related-section of the mod_ssl website) and
On Tue, Feb 09, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think I got one bug with mod_ssl distrib 2.2.0 and 2.2.2.
> When I run mod_ssl's configure, it ends with "patches applyed succesfully" but
> some errors have created *.rej files. The problem is that I am never get
> notified of those errors.
Are
Hi,
I think I got one bug with mod_ssl distrib 2.2.0 and 2.2.2.
When I run mod_ssl's configure, it ends with "patches applyed succesfully" but
some errors have created *.rej files. The problem is that I am never get
notified of those errors.
--
Ronan-Yann Lorintel: +33 6
On Tue, Feb 09, 1999, Toru Takinaka wrote:
> >Yeah, and at least under Solaris it's neither a bug in Apache nor in mod_ssl
> >nor in SSLeay. As it looks it's a result of a strange loading strategy in the
> >Solaris dynamic linker caused by Apache's braindead two-round initialization.
> >I've stil
>Yeah, and at least under Solaris it's neither a bug in Apache nor in mod_ssl
>nor in SSLeay. As it looks it's a result of a strange loading strategy in the
>Solaris dynamic linker caused by Apache's braindead two-round initialization.
>I've still no workaround for this Solaris problem at hand, b
8-Feb-99 12:31 you wrote:
> Khimenko Victor wrote:
>>
>> If you use libc5-based Linux then try to use built-in SDBM !
>> At least Slackware 3.6 has broken DBM :-((
> Uh oh. Yeah, definately a problem here. Slack 3.6 it is. Excuse me for
> not knowing exactly what a "SDBM" is, but I'm left at a
11 matches
Mail list logo