> Hey All,
> This might be a stupid question, I'm not sure. Can you
> drop a mod_ssl
> on an already compiled and running Apache server. As in I
> have RH6.1 with
> Apache 1.3.9 with mod_php. Can I use the mod_ssl.rpm to throw
> on top of
> apache
no
> or do I need to compile apache wit
That is well-known problem.
IE3 does not connect to HTTPS servers with self-made certs.
You have to manually install Cert of your own CA.
Then IE3 connects to your own HTTPS server successfully.
(Don't forget that IE 3.0 does not execute JavaScripts correctly. Use IE
3.02.)
Best regards,
Dmitry
I'm awaiting for the OpenBSD 2.6 CD to ship to me - and I just read that it
includes "Apache 1.3.9 + Mod_ssl 2.4.5 + OpenSSL 0.9.4". Very sweet.
However, Mod_ssl is at 2.4.9.
For those that are running OpenBSD with the latest Apache+Mod_ssl+OpenSSL,
how difficult was it to replace the mod_ssl
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999, Dan Tshin wrote:
> I'm awaiting for the OpenBSD 2.6 CD to ship to me - and I just read that it
> includes "Apache 1.3.9 + Mod_ssl 2.4.5 + OpenSSL 0.9.4". Very sweet.
> However, Mod_ssl is at 2.4.9.
>
> For those that are running OpenBSD with the latest Apache+Mod_ssl+Open
This has been one of my cautions for ages:
the software on a CD is outdated on the day the CD ships. If you use
CD'ed SW, make sure you go out and look on the net for updates and patchs
ASAP!
I do not know how many redhat 5.x installs I see that are open gaping
gates that say; comprimise my s
> That is well-known problem.
> IE3 does not connect to HTTPS servers with self-made certs.
> You have to manually install Cert of your own CA.
> Then IE3 connects to your own HTTPS server successfully.
How does one go about installing this certificate manually? I'm a Linux
and MacOS guy, and don
> > Joe McMahon wrote:
> > >
> > > Am I correct in assuming that IE3 does not work properly with mod_ssl?
> We have
> > > not been able to get an https connection to work between out mod_ssl
> Apache
> > > and IE3; IE4 and Netscapes all seem to work fine.
> > >
> > > --- Joe M.
> > > ...
> >
> >
Hi,
I have compiled mod_ssl2.4.9-1.3.9 with openssl-0.9.4, in the "APACI
one-way", DSO support - and everything seemed ok.
I'm working on sparc / solaris 2.6. This seemed not to happen on another box
(Intel/sol2.6), but I'm not quite sure I used exactly the same options.
I did not have any prob
Hi there-
I apologize for asking this here, but I can't seem to find
instructions elsewhere that work. What I am trying to do is have
multiple domains hosted on one machine, with separate key files for
each (since they have different domain names, they need the different
key files to
Full_Name: Andrew Waegel
Version: mod_ssl-2.4.9
OS: redhat6.1 linux
Submission from: octavo-sdsl416k-gw.mv.best.net (206.184.220.215)
Hello,
I have what I hope is a simple problem. I've been using mod_ssl with apache and
mod_perl on redhat linux very successfully for many months. I've recently
Looks here like the big clue is this line:
Syntax error on line 208 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
try editing that file and looking at the syntactical expression of the
line <208> in question, most likely it's a typo of some sort.
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Philibert de
>>> Drew Schatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/07/99 04:20PM >>>
>NameVirtualHost 207.16.26.2:443
You can't use NameVirtualHost's with SSL. You need separate IP
addresses for each SSL-enabled virtual host. Please read the FAQ at
http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.4/ssl_faq.html#vhosts
Hope this helps,
Cli
>>> "R. DuFresne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/07/99 05:50PM >>>
>> Syntax error on line 208 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
>> Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/libssl.so into server:
ld.so.1:
>> /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file
>> /usr/local/apache/libexec/libssl.
Clliff,
I bow to your better reading and most likely correct interpretation of the
error output.
Thanks for the correction.
Ron DuFresne
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> >>> "R. DuFresne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/07/99 05:50PM >>>
>
> >> Syntax error on line 208 of /usr/local/
Cliff Woolley wrote:
> >>> Drew Schatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/07/99 04:20PM >>>
> >NameVirtualHost 207.16.26.2:443
>
> You can't use NameVirtualHost's with SSL. You need separate IP
> addresses for each SSL-enabled virtual host. Please read the FAQ at
> http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.4/ssl_faq.ht
I think you should first compile your httpd using Apache1.3.9 + mod_ssl +
openssl and then add any other modules like mod_perl, mod_php etc. with DSO
support.
NKN
Original Message Follows
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
Drew Schatt wrote:
For you to have separate SSL-authenticated domains on one machine, they
must all have distinct IP addresses. NameVirtualHost WILL NOT suffice.
This is covered in the FAQ.
--
"Irrigation of the land with seawater desalinated by fusion power
is ancient. It's ca
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999, Philibert de Mercey wrote:
> I have compiled mod_ssl2.4.9-1.3.9 with openssl-0.9.4, in the "APACI
> one-way", DSO support - and everything seemed ok.
>
> I'm working on sparc / solaris 2.6. This seemed not to happen on another box
> (Intel/sol2.6), but I'm not quite sure I
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Andrew Waegel
> Version: mod_ssl-2.4.9
> OS: redhat6.1 linux
> Submission from: octavo-sdsl416k-gw.mv.best.net (206.184.220.215)
>
> I have what I hope is a simple problem. I've been using mod_ssl with apache and
> mod_perl on redhat li
19 matches
Mail list logo
