Need some direction

2000-09-19 Thread Joshua Skains
I am deeply sorry for asking an off topic question, but this is the only group I am a member of at this time and need someone to send me to the right group if possible.   I need some advice on apache directives or webpage tags to stop cache servers like AOL users from overcaching our website

Re: Expired Client Certificate

2000-09-19 Thread Wil Boucher
Same Error, Certificate Verification Error (10): Certificate has Expired... > On Mon, Sep 18, 2000, Wil Boucher wrote: > > > Is it possible to enable SSLVerifyClient to accept expired certificates? > > > > I want to check that the user does in fact have access to a certificate, be > > it expired

Re: [BugDB] URGENT: mod_ssl: Init: Failed to generate temporary 512 b (PR#451)

2000-09-19 Thread modssl-bugdb
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:16:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Did you ever figure out the answer to this? We are having the same problem > here without > sucess in reading those FAQs. > It is in the FAQ and in the archive. For additional info read openssl FAQ also: http://www.openssl.org/s

Re: new to mod_ssl ...

2000-09-19 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 10:05:38AM -0700, Laqtib Slam wrote: > > I am running apache.1.3.9 with the support of DSO. > How can add the mod_ssl to my system whout reinstalling apache again ? You can't! Take this as a good time to upgrade to apache 1.3.12. > Please any installation documentation w

Working Properly

2000-09-19 Thread Mark Lo
Hi,      How to find out that my secure web server is running properly.   Thank you   Mark

Re: [BugDB] URGENT: mod_ssl: Init: Failed to generate temporary 512 b (PR#451)

2000-09-19 Thread Duane Gran
The solution I found was to install a third party /dev/random tool for Solaris. Details about the particular third party library are available here: http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~andi/ I have been using it in production for about 2 months with success on Solaris 2.7 on SPARC. Duane Gran spinweb

[BugDB] URGENT: mod_ssl: Init: Failed to generate temporary 512 b (PR#451)

2000-09-19 Thread modssl-bugdb
Did you ever figure out the answer to this? We are having the same problem here without sucess in reading those FAQs. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List

new to mod_ssl ...

2000-09-19 Thread Laqtib Slam
Hi, I am running apache.1.3.9 with the support of DSO. How can add the mod_ssl to my system whout reinstalling apache again ? Please any installation documentation will also help! thanks in advance -Slam __ Apache Interface to

Re: Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread James Ford
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Work arounds are: > > 1. Different IP addresses - Only sure way to reach everyone but your ISP > may restrict your IP address allocation (solution - move ISP :) > 2. Different ports - But many firewalls block access to non-standard port

Problem with SGC key

2000-09-19 Thread Michal_Hobot
I have a strange problem with SGC key in openssl-0.9.5a mod_ssl-2.6.4-1.3.12 apache_1.3.12. Some of MSIE 5 (these with 56-bit cryptography) complain that cannot connect to server. In ssl engine log there's a request with 56 bits and that's all - no info in ssl request log. Other browsers (MSIE 5

Re: Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread Nick Davies
Thanks for all your reply's. I'm now "in the know". Server setup for IP Aliasing, more IP's ordered, nice :) Kirk Benson wrote: > > My humble suggestion is to add the following text to the email message sent > when a new member subscribes to the list: > > "name-based virtual hosts cannot be

Re: [Feature Request] Handling attempts at SSL name based hosting

2000-09-19 Thread Owen Boyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is there any milage in having mod_ssl abort a start up if you try and configure > it with name based virtual hosting ? The present behaviour is that it prints a warning message; "Attempt to use Name-Based VirtualHosting with SSL" (or words to that effect). It will st

Re: [Feature Request] Handling attempts at SSL name based hosting

2000-09-19 Thread Simon_Wilcox
Sorry ! That's what I meant to say. mod_ssl would only fail to start if it detected that you were trying to configure NBH with SSL. Regular HTTP should not be stopped. It's just an idea - this NBH issue generates SO much noise on this list ;-) Simon.

Re: [Feature Request] Handling attempts at SSL name based hosting

2000-09-19 Thread Bill Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is there any milage in having mod_ssl abort a start up if you try and configure > it with name based virtual hosting ? > > I don't even know if mod_ssl is able to determine this detail of > configuration but since it's definitely not what you want to to d

RE: Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread Kirk Benson
My humble suggestion is to add the following text to the email message sent when a new member subscribes to the list: "name-based virtual hosts cannot be used with SSL. Do not post this question to the list as you will receive multiple RTFM replies. Please read the FAQ on this topic." My own s

[Feature Request] Handling attempts at SSL name based hosting

2000-09-19 Thread Simon_Wilcox
Is there any milage in having mod_ssl abort a start up if you try and configure it with name based virtual hosting ? I don't even know if mod_ssl is able to determine this detail of configuration but since it's definitely not what you want to to do, failing to start and printin

Re: Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000, Nick Davies wrote: > > There are protocol upgrades under consideration but until they are agreed, and > > until most browsers implement them, the answer is still "it's impossible". > > But what do i have to do. I only have one phyiscal server. And i need > to have ssl ser

Re: Expired Client Certificate

2000-09-19 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000, Wil Boucher wrote: > Is it possible to enable SSLVerifyClient to accept expired certificates? > > I want to check that the user does in fact have access to a certificate, be > it expired or not, before giving them access to certain pages. > > Wether I use 'optional' or 're

Re: Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread Simon_Wilcox
Work arounds are: 1. Different IP addresses - Only sure way to reach everyone but your ISP may restrict your IP address allocation (solution - move ISP :) 2. Different ports - But many firewalls block access to non-standard ports i.e. anything not 443. This may not be a p

Re: Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread Simon_Wilcox
Fundamentally yes, your book is wrong ! Although perhaps it is a matter of interpretation - you can separate your HTTP and HTTPS servers as described and run them on one machine but you can still only have one SSL server on port 443 for any given IP address. You can achie

Re: Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread Nick Davies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > There are protocol upgrades under consideration but until they are agreed, and > until most browsers implement them, the answer is still "it's impossible". But what do i have to do. I only have one phyiscal server. And i need to have ssl servers running with differ

Re: Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread Simon_Wilcox
There are protocol upgrades under consideration but until they are agreed, and until most browsers implement them, the answer is still "it's impossible". Simon. (Embedded image moved to file: pic30419.pcx) (Embedded image moved to file: pic16724.pcx) Please respond to

Re: Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread Tim Tassonis
Hi Ralph Wouldn't in be good to have a new mailing list called [EMAIL PROTECTED] People could just pust there and got the link to the FAQ returned. The rest of us could just go on with relevant posts (such as mine...). Bye Tim On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Nick Davies wrote: > Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 1

Re: Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread Nick Davies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > No-one can help you - it isn't possible ! > > See http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.6/ssl_faq.html#ToC46 > > Rgds, > > Simon Wilcox. > > (Embedded image moved to file: pic17115.pcx) (Embedded image moved > to file: pic24003.pcx) > > Plea

Re: Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread Nick Davies
Owen Boyle wrote: > > Nick Davies wrote: > > > > can anyone help me. I have a mod_ssl/apache server running and i'm > > trying to setup name based virtualhosts on it, but i can't figure out > > how. I can setup name based virtualhost on the non ssl server. > > > > Congratulations! > > You are

Re: Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread Owen Boyle
Nick Davies wrote: > > can anyone help me. I have a mod_ssl/apache server running and i'm > trying to setup name based virtualhosts on it, but i can't figure out > how. I can setup name based virtualhost on the non ssl server. > Congratulations! You are the one-millionth mod_ssl user to att

Re: Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread Simon_Wilcox
No-one can help you - it isn't possible ! See http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.6/ssl_faq.html#ToC46 Rgds, Simon Wilcox. (Embedded image moved to file: pic17115.pcx) (Embedded image moved to file: pic24003.pcx) Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Static modules

2000-09-19 Thread Clive Hughes
Guys, Thanks for all your tips. To address some suggestions/questions: Carlos Ramirez: Test certificate created OK; started Apache with startssl command Mads Toftum: OS = Solaris 7, OpenSSL = 0.9.5a and I tried 0.9.6 beta No core is dumped to be able to trace process How I configured: openss

Apache Virtualhosts

2000-09-19 Thread Nick Davies
can anyone help me. I have a mod_ssl/apache server running and i'm trying to setup name based virtualhosts on it, but i can't figure out how. I can setup name based virtualhost on the non ssl server. Thanks. Nick. -- Nick Davies Technical Director Magnitude Ltd www.magnitude.co.uk [EMAIL PRO