Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

Jeff wrote: What is the host name (common name) in the certificates ??? I suspect you have used *.mydomain.dom - correct ??? Hmm, I'm also using name based virtual hosting with ssl as well, but my cert isn't *.domain.dom, it's just cn=domain.dom. The virtual hosts are of the form

Compression in SSL

Hello! I heard that some versions of SSL offer some kind of compression. Is it true? Can I use it? What do I need to configure? What does the user (Browser) needs to have? Is it an alternative to implementing a gzip-Compression using Accept-Encoding: gzip and Content-Encoding: gzip? TIA

Re: Compression in SSL

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 12:06:48PM +0100, Darko Krizic wrote: I heard that some versions of SSL offer some kind of compression. The RFC for TLS does not define a specific method of compression. mod_ssl uses the OpenSSL library, that does not provide compression. (It may in the future.)

Re: Compression in SSL

Lutz Jaenicke wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 12:06:48PM +0100, Darko Krizic wrote: I heard that some versions of SSL offer some kind of compression. The RFC for TLS does not define a specific method of compression. mod_ssl uses the OpenSSL library, that does not provide compression. (It

Re: Port address problem.

I assume that you do not have any other stray processes hangin on to port 443? Do a netstat when you think Apache is down (probably want to explicitely kill it) and see if 443 is in LISTEN mode. If it is, you have something hanging on to the port. Do a 'netstat -ae' and get the inode of the

Ultimate BrowserMatch List (second try)

So, has anybody compiled an ultimate BrowserMatch list for ModSSL-Apache? In my regular Apache I've had the following in for some time now: BrowserMatch Mozilla/2 nokeepalive BrowserMatch MSIE 4\.0b2; nokeepalive downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 BrowserMatch RealPlayer 4\.0 force-response-1.0

Re: Ultimate BrowserMatch List (second try)

-Messaggio originale- Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Per conto di WSO Support Inviato: mercoledi 18 luglio 2001 19.40 A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oggetto: Ultimate BrowserMatch List (second try) So, has anybody compiled an ultimate BrowserMatch list for ModSSL-Apache?

RE: Ultimate BrowserMatch List (second try)

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrea Cerrito What about: SetEnvIf User-Agent MSIE [1-4] nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 SetEnvIf User-Agent MSIE [5-9] ssl-unclean-shutdown Make sure those are

problem with simple redirection

Hello, I have a simple redirection for our web based mail that goes from a http to https. The problem seems to be that if anyone from outside the LAN tries to get to http://webmail.freebsdsystems.com they simply can't. Our virtualhost container is: VirtualHost 216.126.94.34 ServerAdmin [EMAIL

Re: Ultimate BrowserMatch List (second try)

You can see my message dated 6/20 for an example of where to put it. So far my additions work perfectly. DAve on 7/18/01 12:01 PM, David Rees at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrea Cerrito What about:

Question

I just discovered the hardship of using a binary installation of Apache... Can't install FP Extensions to it. (sigh) So I am preparring to build the apache server using the src's .. Question is I already have SSL up and running (mod_ssl) ... Running under apache 1.3.19 now the newest download

Cedar Nannies !

Please, Chris, send me by e-mail the UK site URL, if you don't mind ! Daniel James Stevens wrote: I just discovered the hardship of using a binary installation of Apache... Can't install FP Extensions to it. (sigh) So I am preparring to build the apache server using the src's ..

Re: Ultimate BrowserMatch List (second try)

Thanks so much for sharing your findings, it has helped me a great deal. Thanks, Chris At 03:28 PM 7/18/2001 -0700, you wrote: You can see my message dated 6/20 for an example of where to put it. So far my additions work perfectly. DAve on 7/18/01 12:01 PM, David Rees at [EMAIL PROTECTED]