Thanks so much for sharing your findings, it has helped me
a great deal.
Thanks,
Chris
At 03:28 PM 7/18/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>You can see my message dated 6/20 for an example of where to put it. So far
>my additions work perfectly.
>
>DAve
>
>on 7/18/01 12:01 PM, David Rees at [EMAIL PROTECTE
Please, Chris, send me by e-mail the UK site URL, if you don't mind !
Daniel
James Stevens wrote:
> I just discovered the hardship of using a binary installation of Apache...
> Can't install FP Extensions to it. (sigh)
>
> So I am preparring to build the apache server using the src's .. Ques
I just discovered the hardship of using a binary installation of Apache...
Can't install FP Extensions to it. (sigh)
So I am preparring to build the apache server using the src's .. Question is
I already have SSL up and running (mod_ssl) ... Running under apache 1.3.19
now the newest download fro
You can see my message dated 6/20 for an example of where to put it. So far
my additions work perfectly.
DAve
on 7/18/01 12:01 PM, David Rees at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrea Cerrito
>>
>> What
Hello,
I have a simple redirection for our web based mail that goes from a http to
https. The problem seems to be that if anyone from outside the LAN tries to
get to http://webmail.freebsdsystems.com they simply can't.
Our virtualhost container is:
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ServerName web
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrea Cerrito
>
> What about:
>
> SetEnvIf User-Agent "MSIE [1-4]" nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown
> downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0
> SetEnvIf User-Agent "MSIE [5-9]" ssl-unclean-shutdown
Make sure
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Per conto di WSO Support
> Inviato: mercoledi 18 luglio 2001 19.40
> A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oggetto: Ultimate BrowserMatch List (second try)
>
>
> So, has anybody compiled an "ultimate BrowserMatch list" for
> ModS
So, has anybody compiled an "ultimate BrowserMatch list" for ModSSL-Apache?
In my regular Apache I've had the following in for some time now:
BrowserMatch "Mozilla/2" nokeepalive
BrowserMatch "MSIE 4\.0b2;" nokeepalive downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0
BrowserMatch "RealPlayer 4\.0" force-respons
I assume that you do not have any other stray processes hangin on to
port 443? Do a netstat when you think Apache is down (probably want to
explicitely kill it) and see if 443 is in LISTEN mode. If it is, you
have something hanging on to the port. Do a 'netstat -ae' and get the
inode of the proces
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 12:06:48PM +0100, Darko Krizic wrote:
> > I heard that some versions of SSL offer some kind of compression.
>
> The RFC for TLS does not define a specific method of compression.
> mod_ssl uses the OpenSSL library, that does not provide compression
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 12:06:48PM +0100, Darko Krizic wrote:
> I heard that some versions of SSL offer some kind of compression.
The RFC for TLS does not define a specific method of compression.
mod_ssl uses the OpenSSL library, that does not provide compression.
(It may in the future.)
Hello!
I heard that some versions of SSL offer some kind of compression.
Is it true?
Can I use it?
What do I need to configure?
What does the user (Browser) needs to have?
Is it an alternative to implementing a gzip-Compression using "Accept-Encoding: gzip"
and "Content-Encoding: gzip"?
TIA
Jeff wrote:
> What is the host name (common name) in the certificates ???
> I suspect you have used *.mydomain.dom - correct ???
Hmm, I'm also using name based virtual hosting with ssl as well, but
my cert isn't *.domain.dom, it's just cn=domain.dom. The virtual
hosts are of the form sub1.domain
13 matches
Mail list logo