SSLProtocol all and Mac IE 5

I am using red hat linux with: openssl 0.9.5a 1 Apr 2000 mod_ssl-2.7.1-3 mod_perl-1.24-6 apache-1.3.14-3 My problem is that unless I use: SSLProtocol all -SSLv3 I get data encryption errors on IE 5.0 Mac. The problem with this is that IE Windows users must then have "Use

RE: Apache 1.3.20/ModSSL2.8.4/OpenSSL0.9.6b builds but core dumps.

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I have been having serious difficulties with getting openssl > 0.9.6b to even > build on RedHat 6.2. So much so that I'm considering moving to 7.1. > > Just last week RedHat post

Re: Apache 1.3.20/ModSSL2.8.4/OpenSSL0.9.6b builds but core dumps .

Hi, Perhaps a try..FreeBSD. Regards, Lanny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I have been having serious difficulties with getting openssl 0.9.6b to even > build on RedHat 6.2. So much so that I'm considering moving to 7.1. > > Just last week RedHat posted an updated version of openssl on their s

Compiling mod-ssl for apache

Hello, I've compiled mod-ssl (for apache 1.3.20), using mod_ssl's automatic configure mechanism under Linux. And everything worked well, including installation and starting. But now I want to include more modules (e.g. the configuration you can load down from the apache site which includes all b

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, this is a problem with how *HTTPS* works - SSL (and TLS) are just > channel-level encryption and/or authentication protocols, what you tunnel > through them (and what semantic juggling you do with the peer-certificates, such > as URL <--> CN com

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Owen Boyle wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Can I assign privet ip's to a virtual host and still server it on the web? > > Or will I have to buy public ips? > > I assume you are trying to get round the problem of only-one-SSL-host > per IP address (otherwise there

RE: Apache 1.3.20/ModSSL2.8.4/OpenSSL0.9.6b builds but core dumps.

I have been having serious difficulties with getting openssl 0.9.6b to even build on RedHat 6.2. So much so that I'm considering moving to 7.1. Just last week RedHat posted an updated version of openssl on their site. To quote them: "Updated openssl packages are now available for Red Hat Linux 6

RE: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

No and yes. Although the question is beyond the scope of mod_ssl. Basically, you can't send packets over the 'net to RFC1918 internal IP addresses. A real address has to be used somewhere. - John Airey Internet Systems Support Officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute for the Blind, Bakewell Road

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Can I assign privet ip's to a virtual host and still server it on the web? > Or will I have to buy public ips? I assume you are trying to get round the problem of only-one-SSL-host per IP address (otherwise there is no point in doing this for ordinary HTTP). Think i

RE: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

Can I assign privet ip's to a virtual host and still server it on the web? Or will I have to buy public ips? thanks Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Magnus Stenman Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 11:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

New install of apache13-modssl problem [Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache/libssl.so into ]

Hello, On a server we run, a new install of apache13-modssl was just made. It all installed just fine. However, when attempting to start apache with the script that calls ssl if fails. The error stated is: zing# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache.sh start Syntax error on line 239 of /usr/local/etc/apa