RE: How to disable part of the HTTP pages?

2002-06-09 Thread lin geng
Disable port 80. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Conrad Ng Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How to disable part of the HTTP pages? Dear all After I have implemented the SSL technology in my servers,

RE: How to disable part of the HTTP pages?

2002-06-09 Thread Han,Donghoon
Put "Deny from all" in in the vhost settings where the serving port is 80. Ex) BlahBlahBlah Order Deny,Allow Deny from all BlahBlah Order Allow,Deny Allow from all Refer to the apache manual for further information. -Original Message- From: [EM

Re: 2.0.36 + mod-ssl + Win2k = Easy Money

2002-06-09 Thread John
Well, we got one response from Victor, but he seems to be unable to follow through (we don't get any response from his private e-mail) so we still have $500 for anyone who can give us working binaries of apache 2.0.36 with mod-ssl... Anyone? Is this actually possible? Has anyone ever got this rig

Re: 2.0.36 + mod-ssl + Win2k = Easy Money

2002-06-09 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, John wrote: > Well, we got one response from Victor, but he seems to be unable to > follow through (we don't get any response from his private e-mail) so we > still have $500 for anyone who can give us working binaries of apache > 2.0.36 with mod-ssl... > Anyone? Is this actu

RE: 2.0.36 + mod-ssl + Win2k = Easy Money

2002-06-09 Thread Chris Hsiang
Yes... compiling 2.0.36 with mod ssl is easy... which part of compiling did you guys stocked? It should have the compile out/output text include in the email will help us to understand what happened and the next time you probably can compile the future version of apache -Original Message

Re: 2.0.36 + mod-ssl + Win2k = Easy Money

2002-06-09 Thread John
Thanks Chris, There is a summary of what we did on the original post to this thread... any help is appreciated, thanks, John. - Original Message - From: "Chris Hsiang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: RE: 2.0.36 + mod-ssl + Wi

Re: 2.0.36 + mod-ssl + Win2k = Easy Money

2002-06-09 Thread Steve Parrish
>Hello list members, > >We have just spent (wasted) 3 days trying to compile Apache 2.0.36 with >zlib and mod-ssl on win2k for a critical project and we have been >unsuccessful. Thus the offer of easy money! > >We need working binaries for the config described above URGENTLY and we >are willing to

Re: 2.0.36 + mod-ssl + Win2k = Easy Money

2002-06-09 Thread John
Hello Steve, Thanks for the offer, we now have binaries, supplied by a non-US person, but still we have no luck... we can browse to http://localhost, but not https://localhost. We have temp certs in place and everything looks fine, but no go. The guys working on this have done this 100 times on

RE: 2.0.36 + mod-ssl + Win2k = Easy Money

2002-06-09 Thread Chris Hsiang
I am using win32 of Apache 2.0.35/2.0.36 and I had many problems in the beginning. It took me a week to get it work. First can you show me your config now? Please do an attachement Are you able to start apache with modssl but not yet have any virtual host that with a sslengine on. It is very h

Re: 2.0.36 + mod-ssl + Win2k = Easy Money

2002-06-09 Thread John
We have discovered that if we start Apache from the console with >apache -D SSL on our windows server, then we have ssl support... Please, someone, how do we get ssl support running as a service? It seems we have wasted a couple of days, simply to find this out! John. ___

Re: 2.0.36 + mod-ssl + Win2k = Easy Money

2002-06-09 Thread Mark Chew
Assuming the win2k service for Apache is created (else create one using sc command), try configure the Apache service properties like this : Path to executable: "C:\Program Files\Apache Group\Apache\Apache.exe" --ntservice Startup type: Automatic Regards, Mark >From: "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTE