HAH..Sorry. :) Thanks much.
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 23:28, Daniel Lopez wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:16:22PM -0500, Austin Gonyou wrote:
Does mod SSL support SSL v3.0? Haven't investigated this yet, but
thought I'd ask here first.
Yes it does, it is right there, in the front page
Does mod SSL support SSL v3.0? Haven't investigated this yet, but
thought I'd ask here first.
--
Austin Gonyou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Coremetrics, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
been broken in some
instances in 1.3.23. I'd rather wait anyway, but you know, there is
that.
vh
Mads Toftum
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it.
Latin
.
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512
ned enough to
believe in freedom and openness breed politics into something so good.
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Balzs Nagy wrote:
Dave Paris wrote:
[snip]
just my $0.02 at the state of some recent, mind-
should exist, and never be the same project. Freedom
of choice is what drove most of us to OpenSource, we should embrace this
as an opportunity to continue that tradition.
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Balzs Nagy
If you were to get 3x on a single proc 1ghz, you'd get 5x with smp and
threading. If you ran a large webfarm with really good loadballancing,
you'd NEVER need to have ssl accelerators. Also, you have a hard limit
with your ssl accelerators, that limit just happens to be WAY lower than
what apache
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here here!
P.S. I want to thank Ralf for his excellent work!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6bxsa94g6ZVmFMoIRAvFCAKCVkvE9EkPTv1y4fpZyrpYwKdKG7gCgxgMw
You should probably turn your apache errorlogs to info, and the
ssl_engine_logs to info as well. Start apache, and take a look. It should
tell you. Sounds like you probably have a perms issue with the certs. That
will cause your symptoms.
--
Austin
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, David Rees wrote:
On
SuiteSpot has a Hacked up SSLEngine with built in routines to specifically
not put the FPU intensive stuff on Sparcs. I installed it as well and It
does NOT perform as well on x86 as it does on Sparcs. That said, I do agreee
after reading some further posts that you have a more distinct problem
Yes, go to sunfreeware.com and there is a urandom thing on there, also over
at sun.com there is a urandom thing there as well, and over at google.com
you can find a bunch of links to the /dev/urandom fix for your system.
Hope it works man, and good luck!
Austin
-Original Message-
From:
There are 2 things which come to mind when you're talking about ssl
performance testing. They are: 1. the number of keysigns/sec that a single
server can do without ssl acceleration, and 2. the performance bottlenecks
of the system being tested under HTTPS load.
I've done several hundred million
I'm pretty much an expert on the subject. What do you need?
Austin
-Original Message-
From: Robin P. Blanchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: load-balancing question
could someone please point me to some information
on
Have you tried not loading the chain file and commentint out the
SSLCipherSuite stuff?
Austin
Original Message
On 11/15/00, 4:15:59 PM, Brendon Maragia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
regarding Re: somebody shoot me, please:
Thanks for the idea, Dan but it didn't work :( . Anybody else have
Have you checked the perms on the dirs you are trying to use, as well as
any of the files etc. You could set it all 777 and then start working
from there.
Austin
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)
It is possible, but you will need to do a lot of dnsing. You have a
choice, either set many names in dns for the IP, or Setup many vhosts.
Austin
Original Message
On 11/6/00, 12:21:40 PM, Jacques Guellec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding
Several SSL certificats with Apache under FreeBSD ??
Could someone provide me with this? I've got my modssl compiled in to my
httpd.
Austin
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call Rainbow Tech Support.
Austin
Original Message
On 10/31/00, 8:55:56 PM, mod_ssl_cn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding
hwo to force apache+ssl use CryptoSwift:
Hi
I have installed openssl_engine_0.9.6 , mod_ssl , apache_1.3.14 in my
linux platform .
I have installed hardware crypto
I was doing some testing last night between an Sun UltraEnterprise 1
server with 16 400Mhz CPUs and 8GB ram and an AMD Athlon 500 with 128MB
RAM. Mainly because there was a bunch of info from ApacheCon about SSL.
One table in particular caught my eye. It was a comparison of several
test
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go to sunfreeware.com and get GCC. Add it to your path and
LD_LIBRARY_PATH and then compile to your heart's content.
Austin
Original Message
On 10/31/00, 4:24:47 AM, Hiendl Elke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
regarding SSL-aware Apache on Solaris-x86-cc:
Hi everybody,
I want to set up
in the
webservers to date.
Austin
Original Message
On 10/31/00, 10:05:39 AM, Gary Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
regarding Re: SSL-aware Apache on Solaris-x86-cc:
Austin Gonyou writes:
Go to sunfreeware.com and get GCC. Add it to your path and
LD_LIBRARY_PATH and then compile to your heart's
, 2000 at 10:48:18PM +, Austin Gonyou wrote:
No...if the password has literally been stripped out of the key. So
it's
run without a passhphrase, how could it be put back?
See http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.7/ssl_faq.html#change-passphrase
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who spiked my coffee
If it's been removed, how could it get put back?
Austin
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
, Austin Gonyou wrote:
If it's been removed, how could it get put back?
write a program to guess every password in the book?
--
Nate Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com| Fax : (952)943-8500
In part of my study to show how much we'll gain by using threads, I need
to generate a proof of concept for apache 2.0 using ssl. Does anyone on
this list have any suggestions as to whom I may speak with about
obtaining some kind of ssl code or some hack for integrating one of the
existing
Anyone know if/when mod_ssl will be released for apache 2.0?
Austin
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
/20/00, 4:31:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: Anyone
have any comments on SSL Accelerators?:
I'd be interested in hearing your comments and anyone elses for that
matter. I'm currently evaluating nCipher and Rainbows Cryptoswift
steve
"Austin" == Austin Gonyou [EMAIL
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Austin Gonyou
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 8:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone have any comments on SSL Accelerators?
At this point ALL the accelerators I've tested are indeed
FAST. One thing
which has popped up during this testing however
Depends on the Accelerator. I've got a list if your interested.
Austin
Original Message
On 9/21/00, 5:50:16 PM, Peter Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding
Hardware acceleration support w/ openssl-engine-0.9.6?:
Apologies if this is the second message on the list on this subject, but
30 matches
Mail list logo
