FAQ: Failed to generate temporary 512 bit RSA private key

A modest proposal: Since "Failed to generate temporary 512 bit RSA private key" is such an FAQ on this list (even though it's in the FAQ ;-), perhaps some defensive coding might be order that detects possible errors earlier and so gives a more informative error message? An easy one would to di

Re: Port 443

Joshua Skains <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have a server with the following: > > > ServerName something.hello.com > DocumentRoot /export/home/webdocs/main > SSLDisable > > > ServerName something-ssl.hello.com > DocumentRoot /export/home/webdocs/memb

Not really about: FAQ: Failed to generate temporary 512 bit RSA private key

Hi, Dave Just wanted to say hello, since we're both on this list. David Mitchell, coop-cdc.com David Mitchell wrote: > > A modest proposal: > > Since > > "Failed to generate temporary 512 bit RSA private key" > > is such an FAQ on this list (even tho

Re: name-based vhosts, rotatelog for ssl_engine_log

Martin Decker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just wanted to ask what the latest information regarding name-based > vhosts is. I am using apache with 3 name-based ssl vhosts and a dozen > normal vhosts and it seems to work ok. Howevery, in the ssl_engine_log i > get a warning: [05/Sep/2000 10:54

Re: [Feature Request] Handling attempts at SSL name based hosting

Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Is there any milage in having mod_ssl abort a start up if you try and configure > > it with name based virtual hosting ? > > > > I don't even know if mod_ssl is able to determine this detail of > > configuration

Re: verisign certs (the battle continues)

ax instead. It was money well-spent. Good luck. David Mitchell coop-cdc.com Rob Genovesi wrote: > ... > Now, time for the next issue: I have 2 verisign certs that I have already > installed under Netscape Enterprise Server on another machine. I'm trying > to figure out how