Oleg Makarenko wrote:
>
> Apache core dumps only when AddModule mod_ssl.c comes before AddModule
> mod_php4.c... that is probably a mod_php issue so I'll also try mod_php list.
I have found nothing useful on php site :(
The other workaround I have found is to use LD_PRELOAD=libpt
Lynn Winebarger wrote:
>(1) clean out the previous installation of apache entirely, build with
> mod_ssl first (don't use the "--with-eapi-only" option).
>
I build from scratch every time... actually I use rpm -bc so I am sure the
source is clean. And I don't have --with-eapi-only in rpm's s
I am trying to build apache1.3.12+mod_ssl+php as shared modules. A lot
of php extensions are also build as so (gd.so, mysql.so, oci8.so, xml.so
etc etc). When I start apache with mod_ssl disabled everything works
fine but if I enable it apche coredumps at startup. mod_ssl works fine
with php modul
Florin Andrei wrote:
> Oleg Makarenko wrote:
> >
> > but no page loaded in the browser. (as you can see, it does establish a v2
> >
> > can you try https://www.platina.ru with your browser?
>
> Yes, it works fine!
>
> You can chec
but no page loaded in the browser. (as you can see, it does establish a v2
can you try https://www.platina.ru with your browser?
Oleg
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Suppo
> > Exactly. openssl 0.9.4 does work. 0.9.5x also works with expiremental ciphers
> > disabled.
>
> 0.9.4 *sometimes* work. It doesn't work for me.
>
> (sorry for being so stubborn, but that's it)
Sure there are more differences between 0.9.4 and 0.9.5 then some ciphers
enabled/di
>
> One thing I still don't understand is the following:
>
> If someone downgrades to Apache/1.3.9 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.4.9 OpenSSL/0.9.4
> it works fine with no workarounds required at all. One idea might be
> that the MD5 implementation in IE5 is faulty or they (server and client)
> simply negotiate
> difference is actually inside OpenSSL) or it has to be related to shutdown
> handling. At least from the descriptions of the users, it seems the trouble is
> more related to OpenSSL instead of Apache-SSL or mod_ssl. Hmm..
Exactly. openssl 0.9.4 does work. 0.9.5x also works with expiremental cip
> Server: apache-1.3.12, mod_ssl-2.6.4 (these two compiled from tar.gz),
> openssl-0.9.5a (from the distributed RPMs), Linux Red Hat 6.2
> Client: Windows 2000 Professional (upgraded from NT Workstation), IE
> 5.00.2920. 56-bit
>
Try to recompile openssl-0.9.5a but change ssl/
Florin Andrei wrote:
> Oleg Makarenko wrote:
> >
> > Florin Andrei wrote:
> >
> > > 56-bit IE5 works with apache_ssl but doesn't work with mod_ssl
> >
> > Was apache_ssl compiled with the same openssl library? What openssl library do
> &g
Hi,
David Rees wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found a good workaround to this problem. Instead of changing SSLProtocol
> to "all -SSLv2", you can make your SSLCipherSuite line read:
>
> SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP
>
The other way is to recompile openssl 0.9.5 w
Florin Andrei wrote:
> Seb Bacon wrote:
> >
> > N.B. I can see some GID sites using my copy of 5.01 / 56 bit. Whether this
> > is a server-side workaround or something else I don't know. Any clues?
>
> 56-bit IE5 works with apache_ssl but doesn't work with mod_ssl
Was apache_ssl compil
S3) Why can't I view my site using IE5.x?
> There are two irritating bugs in IE5's implementation of SSL not mentioned
> on the mod_ssl website. One is that you can't use IP addresses - you must
> use the FQDN to access the site. The other bug affects non-128-bit versions
> of IE 5.01, which ba
13 matches
Mail list logo
