Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1.2-1.3.3

1998-12-07 Thread John Baskind
I'm sure this is a stupid question, but please humour me... I have upgraded from 2.15...2.1..2.1.1...2.1.2, each time reinstalling the server, i.e., fresh apache, fresh (new) m0d_ssl, and fresh mod_perl. Is this necessary? Is it possible just to add the updated pakage (whichever one) to the

Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1.2-1.3.3

1998-12-07 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Sun, Dec 06, 1998, John Baskind wrote: I'm sure this is a stupid question, but please humour me... I have upgraded from 2.15...2.1..2.1.1...2.1.2, each time reinstalling the server, i.e., fresh apache, fresh (new) m0d_ssl, and fresh mod_perl. Is this necessary? Is it possible just to

ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1.2-1.3.3

1998-12-03 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
Here is the next pure bugfixing release. In addition to other minor fixes it mainly solves the problem where under Linux boxes the DBM library wasn't correctly found. Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1.2-1.3.3

1998-12-03 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Thu, Dec 03, 1998, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: [...] Changes with mod_ssl 2.1.2 (30-Nov-1998 to 03-Dec-1998) [...] The FreeBSD port is now again in sync with the current release version: I've updated the www/apache13-modssl port to Apache 1.3.3 + mod_ssl 2.1.2 now. Happy packaging ;-)