Re: mod_ssl: SSLRequire

2006-04-05 Thread Olaf Gellert
://www.ecsirt.net/sensornet __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org Automated List Manager[EMAIL

RE: mod_ssl: SSLRequire

2006-04-05 Thread Oliver.Schaudt
__ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] winmail.dat

Re: mod_ssl: SSLRequire

2006-04-05 Thread Olaf Gellert
] A daily view on Internet Attacks https://www.ecsirt.net/sensornet __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List

toggling signing and encryption using Mod_SSL + certificates

2006-02-16 Thread Arjun Khanna
Hi: I am working on securing a webservice front-ended by the Apache webserver.It is possible that in this application the requirements will be : (1) Clients be authenticated using a password they enter using a form that is secured using https. For this I am planning to download mod_ssl

Apache with Mod_SSL installation problems

2006-02-13 Thread dpgirago
Hope this is the right place to ask this question. Please direct to another list if I'm off-topic here. I'm trying to install Apache 1.3.31 with Mod_SSL on a Windows Server 2003 box, ultimately for Apache-MySQL-PHP applications. I have all set up ok on my desk top and thought it would be a simple

Cleanup of mod_ssl compiler warnings

2006-02-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Some changes in mod_ssl API

2006-01-21 Thread Andrei V. Shetuhin
-- if we use, for example, Subversion VCS and make user authentication via certificate we take strange commiter's usename. I suggest to make some changes in mod_ssl module to allow set username as a part of Subject of the Client's X509 Certificate. For example, if SSLUserName is set

[ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.25-1.3.34 for Apache 1.3.34

2005-10-18 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
Apache 1.3.34 was released, so I've upgraded mod_ssl to apply cleanly to this Apache version. No other changes. Fetch mod_ssl 2.8.25-1.3.34 from the usual locations: o http://www.modssl.org/source/ o ftp://ftp.modssl.org/source/ Yours, Ralf S. Engelschall

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead (Thanks!)

2005-09-27 Thread Pigeon
Thanks for all the great info! It definitly gives me a nice footing from which I can start. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List modssl-users

Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Pigeon
key caching, anyone know how much this will improve things? Any good resources I can read? thanks! Lee __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Martin Strandbygaard
how much this will improve things? Any good resources I can read? thanks! Lee __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Dave paris
at clustering? Also.. I ahve heard about ssl session key caching, anyone know how much this will improve things? Any good resources I can read? thanks! Lee __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Cliff Woolley
speaking -- it's been a long time since I benchmarked it). --Cliff __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org Automated List Manager

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Pigeon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: modssl-users@modssl.org Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead Hi, A few words about intended usage would be of great help. - How many concurrent users - Type of transactions - You really think the http front is going to be you

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Mads Toftum
Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org Automated List

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Pigeon
__ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Aaron Turner
heard about ssl session key caching, anyone know how much this will improve things? Any good resources I can read? thanks! Lee ___ ___ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Phil Ehrens
raped by the penguin. Oops, I hope this isn't a family list. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org Automated List Manager

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Jeffrey Burgoyne
at clustering? Also.. I ahve heard about ssl session key caching, anyone know how much this will improve things? Any good resources I can read? thanks! Lee __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Mads Toftum
keep even without SSL. Doesn't your pr0n streaming business generate enough income to pay for a real server? ;) vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Pigeon
, 2005 1:27 PM Subject: Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:28:11AM -0400, Pigeon wrote: Hmm.. 10k -100k are pretty much guaranteed numbers.. That's quite a wide margin. Are we talking concurrent users or just number of people who could be using it over a period

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread dparis
with the 1000mbit connection? thank you for all of your time and input! thanks Lee - Original Message - From: Mads Toftum [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: modssl-users@modssl.org Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 1:27 PM Subject: Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead On Mon, Sep 26, 2005

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Jeffrey Burgoyne
Subject: Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:28:11AM -0400, Pigeon wrote: Hmm.. 10k -100k are pretty much guaranteed numbers.. That's quite a wide margin. Are we talking concurrent users or just number of people who could be using it over a period of xx

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Phil Ehrens
asking apache to stick it's finger in the dike. Good luck. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org Automated List Manager

Re: Mod_ssl and how to reduce overhead

2005-09-26 Thread Cliff Woolley
to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.24-1.3.33

2005-09-02 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
A subtle security bug (CAN-2005-2700) was discovered in mod_ssl where where SSLVerifyClient require was not enforced in per-location context if SSLVerifyClient optional was configured in the global virtual host configuration. This bug is now fixed in mod_ssl 2.8.24 for Apache 1.3.33. Get it from

RE: Problem starting mod_ssl and apache

2005-07-08 Thread Drew J. Como
, 2005 9:10 PM To: modssl-users@modssl.org Subject: Problem starting mod_ssl and apache All, I am having an interesting problem where I am getting the following error message when I start Apache: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/mod_sxnet.so into server: shared object not open I have built the following

Problem starting mod_ssl and apache

2005-07-07 Thread Drew J. Como
, mod_ssl-2.8.23, openssl-0.9.8) Anyone have an idea as to what is wrong? (Or what I built wrong??) Thanks :-) Drew __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List

[ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.23 for Apache 1.3.33 and OpenSSL 0.9.8

2005-07-06 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
As OpenSSL 0.9.8 was released today, I've released another maintenance version mod_ssl 2.8.23 for use with Apache 1.3.33 and OpenSSL 0.9.8. Included are also a few other changes (see below for details). Get mod_ssl 2.8.23 from: o http://www.modssl.org/source/ o ftp://ftp.modssl.org/source

Dumping SSL Certificates form mod_ssl in apache

2005-07-04 Thread Pj
Hi all, I am writing a module for apache that needs to dump client certificate information from mod_ssl which ultimately uses OpenSSL... Does anyone have any idea how to apply this hook? Thanks.. Pj. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti

Minor bug in apachectl script (apache+mod_ssl distrib)

2005-06-10 Thread Michael Kichanov
Hi! I have found a small bug in 'apachectl' script (apache_1.3.33+mod_ssl-2.8.22). 'configtest' option of this script does not work inside IfDefine SSL clause. The simple workaround is to add next block of code into script: configtestssl) if $HTTPD -t -DSSL

mod_ssl with mod_auth

2005-06-04 Thread Christoph Schindler
in error.log: [Fri Jun 3 14:47:46 2005] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake failed: HTTP spoken on HTTPS port; trying to send HTML error page... What Apache actually sends though, is a 401 Authorization Required, so you also get the authentication dialog in the web browser. If you now fill in your

RE: mod_ssl

2005-02-01 Thread Mike Fratto
Title: Message What version of Apache and mod_ssl are you using? Are you trying to compile it in static or are you using DSO? Need more details. If your unclear about the above, read this for a quick overview (if you haven't already) http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_overview.html

Re: mod_ssl

2005-02-01 Thread R. DuFresne
become inappropriate. My love for you has no strings attached. I love you for free... -Tom Robins Still Life With Woodpecker __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User

Is mod_ssl installed

2005-01-31 Thread Plantier, Spencer
Title: Is mod_ssl installed I cant get ssl to work. I did a search on my httpd.conf and it has (IfModule mod_ssl.c) Include conf/ssl.conf (/IfModule) And when I do a httpd l I get: Compiled in modules: core.c mod_access.c mod_auth.c mod_include.c mod_log_config.c

AW: Apache 2 with mod_ssl for windows

2005-01-27 Thread R. Markham
2005 18:51 An: modssl-users@modssl.org Betreff: Apache 2 with mod_ssl for windows I've previously build Apache 1.3 for Windows with ssl support using mod_ssl so I'm familiar with this process. I looks like I need to do it for Apache 2 as well because I didn't see the mod_ssl module

RE: Apache 2 with mod_ssl for windows

2005-01-27 Thread Lange, Bill Charles
Thanks for the info. I was able to get a clean build from the apache and openssl source distributions last night. The apache site contains the following page which describes pretty well how to build the openssl, and apache with mod_ssl directly from the source if you have the microsoft

RE: Apache 2 with mod_ssl for windows

2005-01-27 Thread Richard Markham
for the info. I was able to get a clean build from the apache and openssl source distributions last night. The apache site contains the following page which describes pretty well how to build the openssl, and apache with mod_ssl directly from the source if you have the microsoft developer

mod_ssl for Apache 2

2005-01-26 Thread ColinB
I'm slightly confused. The www.modssl.org site says that it is for Apache 1 and makes no mention (that I could find) of Apache 2. Yet there is a mod_ssl module mentioned on the Apache 2 web pages http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_ssl.html credited to the same author. What

Re: mod_ssl for Apache 2

2005-01-26 Thread Mads Toftum
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:15:37AM -0800, ColinB wrote: What is the relationship between mod_ssl for Apache 1 and Apache 2 ? The mod_ssl in apache2 is based on the mod_ssl for Apache 1.3, but the two versions are not the same module. Why doesn't www.modssl.org say that it is for both Apache 1

Re: mod_ssl for Apache 2

2005-01-26 Thread Tony Andrews
I think I know the answer to this but what the heck... I run apachectl -l and get... core.c worker.c http_core.c mod_so.c No mod_ssl . This is Apache 2.0.39. Is there a way to get mod_ssl installed on this server outside of re-installing Apache? Thanks, Tony Andrews - Original Message

Apache 2 with mod_ssl for windows

2005-01-26 Thread Lange, Bill Charles
I've previously build Apache 1.3 for Windows with ssl support using mod_ssl so I'm familiar with this process. I looks like I need to do it for Apache 2 as well because I didn't see the mod_ssl module in the windows pre-packaged install and the no ssl at the end of the installer filename

Re: mod_ssl, block-on-read problem?

2005-01-25 Thread Anders Ringaby
not shut down the connection, that is, the client or peer has not performed a shutdown(), close() or exit(). Of course, you could argue that mod_ssl should have implemented a timeout for conditions like that. Maybe there is some kind of protocol problem here, in that mod_ssl is still expecting data

mod_ssl, block-on-read problem?

2005-01-24 Thread Bob Tanner
several days of data, the client IPs seem to be cache servers. Anyone know of a reason why the socket can't/won't close? That's all the info I can think of reporting. Anyone seen this problem before? Since the problem doesn't happen with http, I -assume- this is a mod_ssl problem, but if not, I'll try

Re: mod_ssl, block-on-read problem?

2005-01-24 Thread Bob Tanner
-8700 http://www.mn-linux.org, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500 Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42 1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288 __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support

Re: mod_ssl environment variables

2005-01-17 Thread Matt Stevenson
. Regards Matt --- Jason Kaskel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is technically both a mod_perl and mod_ssl question. Maybe I should harass their mailing list too. I have a PerlAccessHandler that needs to access certificate information. According to what I've read the environment isn't loaded

Re: mod_ssl environment variables

2005-01-17 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 04:48:09PM -0500, Jason Kaskel wrote: This is technically both a mod_perl and mod_ssl question. Maybe I should harass their mailing list too. I have a PerlAccessHandler that needs to access certificate information. According to what I've read the environment isn't

mod_ssl environment variables

2005-01-14 Thread Jason Kaskel
This is technically both a mod_perl and mod_ssl question. Maybe I should harass their mailing list too. I have a PerlAccessHandler that needs to access certificate information. According to what I've read the environment isn't loaded with this information until the fixup phase which occurs

Re: Apache and MOD_SSL

2004-12-28 Thread Mads Toftum
__ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

problems with IE and mod_ssl

2004-12-28 Thread Craig Reeson
guys, I have mod_ssl working on my site. It works fine with Mozilla/Firefox (regardless of OS), but it refuses to work with IE. I have googled all the necessary things to get it working with IE but nothing seems to work. Logs: tail -20 /var/log/apache/ssl_engine_log | 3220: 63 67 69 3f 30 3e 06

Apache and MOD_SSL

2004-12-27 Thread leandro asnaghi-nicastro
network. Despite generating the keys (password free) and signing them, configuring to what I believed to be correct (obviously not) conf files for mod_ssl and httpd, I get the following error: $ openssl s_client -connect def.con.ca:443 CONNECTED(0003) 24271:error:140770FC:SSL

Re: mod_ssl and MacOS browsers...

2004-11-15 Thread Philip Larkin Waters
. Practice is when something works, but you don't know why. Programmers combine theory and practice: Nothing works and they don't know why. --Unknown - Original Message - From: Tim Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:17 AM Subject: Re: mod_ssl

Re: Apache/mod_ssl/IE problem

2004-11-03 Thread Matt Stevenson
. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=305217 http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS04-004.mspx We also get the following error in the SSL error log: [Tue Oct 26 06:43:04 2004] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake interrupted by system [Hint: Stop button pressed

[ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.22 for Apache 1.3.33

2004-10-30 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
Apache 1.3.32's mod_ssl 2.8.21 still works fine for Apache 1.3.33. Nevertheless I've rolled a new patch-adjusted version mod_ssl 2.8.22 which fits 1:1 for Apache 1.3.33. Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED

mod_ssl and MacOS browsers...

2004-10-28 Thread Tim Howell
I've just installed a VeriSign 128 bit certificate on a server running Apache 2.0.50 with mod_ssl. Connecting to the server over https works fine from all of the Windows clients I've tried (Win2K using both IE 6 and Firefox 1.0PR). However, whenever I try to connect from a MacOS client (using

Re: mod_ssl and MacOS browsers...

2004-10-28 Thread Tim Howell
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:42:53 -0700, Tim Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just installed a VeriSign 128 bit certificate on a server running Apache 2.0.50 with mod_ssl. Connecting to the server over https works fine from all of the Windows clients I've tried (Win2K using both IE 6

RE: Schedule for mod_ssl 2.8.20-1.3.32?

2004-10-22 Thread Drew J. Como
Bernd, It appears that the updated package is already released. From what I can tell, it has been up for a few hours now. http://www.modssl.org/source/mod_ssl-2.8.21-1.3.32.tar.gz Cheers! Drew J. Como Phone: 631-434-6600 Systems

[ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.21 for Apache 1.3.32

2004-10-22 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
Apache 1.3.32 was released. Although mod_ssl 2.8.20-1.3.31 both applies and works fine with Apache 1.3.32 I've upgraded mod_ssl to this new Apache version and released the results as mod_ssl 2.8.21-1.3.32. Ralf S. Engelschall

[ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.20-1.3.31

2004-10-15 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
Prompted by a security issue (see below), mod_ssl 2.8.20 for Apache 1.3.31 was released today. You can get it at the usual location: o http://www.modssl.org/source/ o ftp://ftp.modssl.org/source/ Yours, Ralf S. Engelschall

[ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.20-1.3.31

2004-10-15 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
Prompted by a security issue (see below), mod_ssl 2.8.20 for Apache 1.3.31 was released today. You can get it at the usual location: o http://www.modssl.org/source/ o ftp://ftp.modssl.org/source/ Yours, Ralf S. Engelschall

mod_ssl and EVP interface

2004-10-13 Thread Gabriel Tataranu
Hi, is it possible to use ciphers trough EVP interface ? In openssl it's easy to do using '-evp' option. I haven't seen any option in mod_ssl related to this. Thanks, Gabriel __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl

Re: mod_ssl on sparc solaris

2004-09-15 Thread Matt Stevenson
mod_ssl working on solaris First we tried at suse 8.2 and there was no problem at all, but now we have troubles and hope someone can give us a hint.. While doing config and make there seems to be no problem Even apache can be started and apachectl configtest says Syntax OK but when

mod_ssl on sparc solaris

2004-09-14 Thread Helke Schröder
Hi, we have some problems to get mod_ssl working on solaris First we tried at suse 8.2 and there was no problem at all, but now we have troubles and hope someone can give us a hint.. While doing config and make there seems to be no problem Even apache can be started and apachectl configtest says

is it possible to modify the mod_ssl env table ?

2004-07-26 Thread richard dinh
Hi, This is a general question about mod_ssl. Once the environment of the mod_ssl gets populated, is it possible to change the env variables through another module? For example, the certificate information gets passed as SSL_CLIENT_S_DN, and I need to rewrite that string value with something else

Re: Remarks to [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.19

2004-07-25 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
for mod_ssl 2.8.20 the following patch. Thanks for your feedback. Might mod_ssl 2.8.20 be released in the near future, e.g within a week? No, I'll certainly accumulate more fixes before a release, I think. Ralf S. Engelschall

Re: Remarks to [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.19

2004-07-25 Thread a . moon
Sorry I am away on annual leave. Please contact OLSU if urgent, otherwise i will get back to you as soon as possible on my return on the 2nd August 2004. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl

Re: Remarks to [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.19

2004-07-23 Thread Bernd Steinert
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Yes, although they are not security related, they could crash the server, too. So we should fix those formatting bugs, too. A little bit of extra casting might be required, I think. I've now committed to my CVS for mod_ssl 2.8.20 the following patch. Thanks for your

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.19 for Apache 1.3.31

2004-07-21 Thread Joe Orton
(long)); near that. Casting the value to a long would be better than a runtime assertion if you're worried about it, there's only one place it happens. joe __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.19 for Apache 1.3.31

2004-07-20 Thread a k
__ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.19 for Apache 1.3.31

2004-07-17 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004, Joe Orton wrote: I'm checking an older version of mod_ssl but there are a couple of other uninteresting format string warnings from gcc. I think it's portable to assume time_t is a long... [...] Yes, although they are not security related, they could crash the server

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.19 for Apache 1.3.31

2004-07-17 Thread Joe Orton
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 08:57:09AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Yes, although they are not security related, they could crash the server, too. So we should fix those formatting bugs, too. A little bit of extra casting might be required, I think. I've now committed to my CVS for mod_ssl

[ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.19 for Apache 1.3.31

2004-07-16 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
We've today found an ssl_log() related format string vulnerability in the mod_proxy hook functions of mod_ssl for Apache 1.3.x (mod_ssl for Apache 2.x is not affected). A mod_ssl 2.8.19 for Apache 1.3.31 was created which fixes this potential security hole. Get mod_ssl-2.8.19-1.3.31.tar.gz from

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.19 for Apache 1.3.31

2004-07-16 Thread Joe Orton
I'm checking an older version of mod_ssl but there are a couple of other uninteresting format string warnings from gcc. I think it's portable to assume time_t is a long... --- ./ssl_engine_io.c.warnings 2002-02-23 18:45:45.0 + +++ ./ssl_engine_io.c 2004-07-16 22:02:32.0

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.18

2004-05-28 Thread Udo Schweigert
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 17:21:07 +0100, Joe Orton wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 05:09:17PM +0200, Boyle Owen wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 15:21:37 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Changes with mod_ssl 2.8.18 (11-May-2004 to 27-May-2004) *) Fix buffer overflow in SSLOptions

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.17 for Apache 1.3.31

2004-05-27 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, May 14, 2004, a k wrote: Did you add my eintr fix ? [...] Ops, I seem to have overlooked this. I'll include this into mod_ssl 2.8.18. Thanks. Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED

[ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.18

2004-05-27 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
A security issue was discovered. It is now fixed with mod_ssl 2.8.18. Please upgrade your installations ASAP. o http://www.modssl.org/source/ o ftp://ftp.modssl.org/source/ Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.17 for Apache 1.3.31

2004-05-27 Thread Martin Nyberg
test On Thu, 27 May 2004 14:49:35 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2004, a k wrote: Did you add my eintr fix ? [...] Ops, I seem to have overlooked this. I'll include this into mod_ssl 2.8.18. Thanks. Ralf S. Engelschall

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.18

2004-05-27 Thread Udo Schweigert
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 15:21:37 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Changes with mod_ssl 2.8.18 (11-May-2004 to 27-May-2004) *) Fix buffer overflow in SSLOptions +FakeBasicAuth implementation if the Subject-DN in the client certificate exceeds 6KB in length. (CVE CAN-2004

RE: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.18

2004-05-27 Thread Boyle Owen
-Original Message- From: Udo Schweigert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2004 17:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.18 On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 15:21:37 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Changes with mod_ssl 2.8.18 (11-May-2004

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.18

2004-05-27 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 05:09:17PM +0200, Boyle Owen wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 15:21:37 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Changes with mod_ssl 2.8.18 (11-May-2004 to 27-May-2004) *) Fix buffer overflow in SSLOptions +FakeBasicAuth implementation if the Subject-DN

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.17 for Apache 1.3.31

2004-05-27 Thread a k
Thanks !! ak --- Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2004, a k wrote: Did you add my eintr fix ? [...] Ops, I seem to have overlooked this. I'll include this into mod_ssl 2.8.18. Thanks. Ralf S. Engelschall

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.17 for Apache 1.3.31

2004-05-27 Thread a . moon
I am away on paternity leave for the next few days. Please contact OLSU if urgent, otherwise i will get back to you as soon as possible on my return. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.17 for Apache 1.3.31

2004-05-14 Thread a k
,SSL READ ERROR IGNORED on pid (%d)\n,getpid()); continue; } --- Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yesterday Apache 1.3.31 was released. I've updated mod_ssl 2.8 to this version and released the result (together with some other pending bugfixes; see

[ANNOUNCE] mod_ssl 2.8.17 for Apache 1.3.31

2004-05-12 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
Yesterday Apache 1.3.31 was released. I've updated mod_ssl 2.8 to this version and released the result (together with some other pending bugfixes; see below) as mod_ssl 2.8.17-1.3.31. You can find it under the usual locations: o http://www.modssl.org/source/ o ftp://ftp.modssl.org/source

apache error handling with mod_ssl

2004-05-02 Thread Arnaud Sahuguet
to return a given page when the mod_ssl module detects an error? For instance when someone tries to access a folder where client certificates are requires, I would like to redirect to a page that mentions that client certificates are required. Same for other filters that mod_ssl supports. regards

Client certificate verification Error handling in apache2 with mod_ssl

2004-04-15 Thread Lamot Michael
Hello, Does mod_ssl support any type of error handling for the client certificate authentification? I'd really like to have another page load than a server not found one when a client presents an invalid certificate. If not, is it possible to bypass some verifications such as the cert

Re: mod_ssl, mod_rewrite, apache2 problem.

2004-04-08 Thread Victoriano Giralt
/ --- __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL

mod_ssl, mod_rewrite, apache2 problem.

2004-04-07 Thread simontst
Hi, I am running apache2, mod_ssl, on freebsd4.9 and I am using the mod_rewrite engine to redirect requests for http - https. I have this working using: RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !=on RewriteRule ^/(.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R,L] The nasty problem is that when I redirect

mod_ssl, mod_rewrite, apache2 problem.

2004-04-07 Thread a . moon
. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Is it possible to 'add' mod_ssl later on, without recompiling all of Apache?

2004-03-23 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:33:11PM +0100, Evert Meulie wrote: Hi! The following case: A apache-2.0.48 server which was compiled without SSL. Now the powers that be have decided the server should also be able to support https, so mod_ssl needs to be 'added'. Is it possible to do

vulnerability in mod_ssl on apache 2

2004-03-12 Thread Boyle Owen
Greetings, Does the DoS vulnerability reported in http://secunia.com/advisories/11092/ affect the mod_ssl-2.8.16-1.3.29 codebase? Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat keinen

Re: vulnerability in mod_ssl on apache 2

2004-03-12 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 01:19:04PM +0100, Boyle Owen wrote: Does the DoS vulnerability reported in http://secunia.com/advisories/11092/ affect the mod_ssl-2.8.16-1.3.29 codebase? No, it doesn't. joe __ Apache Interface

Re: vulnerability in mod_ssl on apache 2

2004-03-12 Thread Mads Toftum
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 01:19:04PM +0100, Boyle Owen wrote: Greetings, Does the DoS vulnerability reported in http://secunia.com/advisories/11092/ affect the mod_ssl-2.8.16-1.3.29 codebase? All the filtering stuff in mod_ssl was new in the Apache 2 version and didn't turn up until after

force mod_ssl to choose 3DES over RC4 ciphers?

2004-02-12 Thread Daniel Eggleston
of OpenSSL, equates to: EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA:DES-CBC3-SHA:DES-CBC3- MD5:RC4-SHA:RC4-MD5:RC2-CBC-MD5:RC4-MD5 Is it possible to construct a cipher-spec string that will make Apache/mod_ssl choose a 3DES cipher when both RC4 and 3DES are 'offered' by the client (most clients seem

Re: force mod_ssl to choose 3DES over RC4 ciphers?

2004-02-12 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
for the SSLCipherSuite directive is 'HIGH:MEDIUM' which, with my version of OpenSSL, equates to: EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA:DES-CBC3-SHA:DES-CBC3- MD5:RC4-SHA:RC4-MD5:RC2-CBC-MD5:RC4-MD5 Is it possible to construct a cipher-spec string that will make Apache/mod_ssl choose a 3DES

Crash in mod_ssl-2.8.10

2004-02-12 Thread Juergen Weigert
to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

There appears to be a major memory leak in mod_ssl/OpenSSL

2004-01-30 Thread Avery, Ken
Title: There appears to be a major memory leak in mod_ssl/OpenSSL I have been tracking this down for a couple of weeks and thought it was in the code my company is developing and it appears that is not the case. In order to eliminate our code from the mix and isolate the problem here is what

Re: There appears to be a major memory leak in mod_ssl/OpenSSL

2004-01-30 Thread Joe Orton
: This was done on Windows and Linux: 1. Download the latest Apache from www.apache.org. 2. Download the latest OpenSSL from www.openssl.org. 3. Build them both, with apache add the mod_ssl option and also for Linux use the MPM worker module. Are you using 2.0.48? Could be one of these two

Re: There appears to be a major memory leak in mod_ssl/OpenSSL

2004-01-30 Thread Adrien Felon
There appears to be a major memory leak in mod_ssl/OpenSSLHello, I encountered many memory leak trouble with OpenSSL. I used quite old versions (from 0.9.6c), so I don't know if this is relevant or not for you... Anyway I figured out that nobody seemed to ever call the CRYPTO_thread_cleanup(). I

RE: There appears to be a major memory leak in mod_ssl/OpenSSL

2004-01-30 Thread John Hughes
Title: There appears to be a major memory leak in mod_ssl/OpenSSL Are u using: On linux you really should be using a shared memory session cache - like SSLSessionCache shmcb:logs/ssl_gcache_data(512000) SSLSessionCacheTimeout 300 and not the dbm cache I posted some email about

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >