Re: Problems with Apache 2.0.35 and SSL

2002-04-17 Thread Jason Buchanan
if you're building this in Solaris, you need the Sun ld that is in /usr/ccs/bin - NOT the GCC ld. GCC ld will not build binaries that run DSO Apache ;-) later... jsb paul priestman wrote: > > Hello, > > I have two questions/problems that may be bugs or just my error - hope > you can help

Re: Problems with Apache 2.0.35 and SSL

2002-04-17 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, paul priestman wrote: > 1. I have managed to install Apache 2.0.35 with mod SSL but it ony works > when i sepecify the servername as been the servers IP address instead of the > actual name - is this a bug or is this the way Apache in tended? Do you mean in the actual Serve

Re: Problems with Apache 2.0.35 and SSL

2002-04-17 Thread R. DuFresne
I think Owen mentioned a week ago or so that ssl also has to be compiled as 'shared' for this to work, else there are problems. Thanks, Ron DuFresne On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, paul priestman wrote: > > Hello, > > I have two questions/problems that may be bugs or just my error - hope you > can he

Re: Problems with Apache 2.0.35 and SSL

2002-04-18 Thread paul priestman
1. I have managed to install Apache 2.0.35 with mod SSL but it ony works >when i sepecify the servername as been the servers IP address instead of >the >actual name - is this a bug or is this the way Apache in tended? Do you mean in the actual ServerName directive? No that's not intended, but