This has been officially rejected by Michael G. Schwern.
However he mentioned that he would accept a new filtering mechanism that
took Perl code rather than shell snippets.
Weather or not I do this is dependant on time and it now seems I'll have
to live with a distribution specific package for a
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 12:31, Robert Lehr wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 05:14:21AM -0400, Kevin C. Krinke wrote:
> > I have submitted a wish-list bug-report at rt.cpan.org for
> > ExtUtils::MakeMaker regarding a compliment option to the PM_FILTER
> > option for Perl Module files called PL_FILTER.
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Kevin C. Krinke wrote:
> Please for heaven's sake, do not reply to me and CC the list, simply
> reply to the list as the duplicate emails to me are not appreciated.
There's a simple procmail filter for this:
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 /home/autarch/.procmail/msgid
Please for heaven's sake, do not reply to me and CC the list, simply
reply to the list as the duplicate emails to me are not appreciated.
Thanks for your co-operation in this matter :)
--
Kevin C. Krinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Open Door Software Inc.
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 10:07, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 05:14:21AM -0400, Kevin C. Krinke wrote:
> > I have submitted a wish-list bug-report at rt.cpan.org for
> > ExtUtils::MakeMaker regarding a compliment option to the PM_FILTER
> > option for Perl Module files called PL_FILTE
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 04:27 AM, Kate L Pugh wrote:
On Wed 10 Sep 2003, "Kevin C. Krinke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I have submitted a wish-list bug-report at rt.cpan.org for
ExtUtils::MakeMaker regarding a compliment option to the PM_FILTER
option for Perl Module files called PL_
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:31:58AM -0700, Robert Lehr wrote:
> ...I do not see a good reason that these filters should spawn a separate process
> to execute a regex for every filter for every file.
>
> Why not implement "the traditional unix sense" filter in perl? Or change the
> module to d
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 05:14:21AM -0400, Kevin C. Krinke wrote:
> I have submitted a wish-list bug-report at rt.cpan.org for
> ExtUtils::MakeMaker regarding a compliment option to the PM_FILTER
> option for Perl Module files called PL_FILTER.
>
> I would like to get everyone else's opinions on th
Title: RE: ExtUtils::MakeMaker PL_FILTER option
> FILTER_MAP => {
> qr/.pm$/ => 'grep ...', # like PM_FILTER
> qr/.pl$/ => 'grep ...', # like PL_FILTER
> qr/.cgi|my_binary/ => 'grep ...', # ...very flexible
> },
>
> In Data::FormValidator, ther
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 05:14:21AM -0400, Kevin C. Krinke wrote:
> I have submitted a wish-list bug-report at rt.cpan.org for
> ExtUtils::MakeMaker regarding a compliment option to the PM_FILTER
> option for Perl Module files called PL_FILTER.
>
> I would like to get everyone else's opinions on th
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 05:27, Kate L Pugh wrote:
> On Wed 10 Sep 2003, "Kevin C. Krinke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have submitted a wish-list bug-report at rt.cpan.org for
> > ExtUtils::MakeMaker regarding a compliment option to the PM_FILTER
> > option for Perl Module files called PL_FILTER.
On Wed 10 Sep 2003, "Kevin C. Krinke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have submitted a wish-list bug-report at rt.cpan.org for
> ExtUtils::MakeMaker regarding a compliment option to the PM_FILTER
> option for Perl Module files called PL_FILTER.
Am I right in thinking that one purpose for this would
I have submitted a wish-list bug-report at rt.cpan.org for
ExtUtils::MakeMaker regarding a compliment option to the PM_FILTER
option for Perl Module files called PL_FILTER.
I would like to get everyone else's opinions on the matter as well.
If you don't have any idea as to what PL_FILTER would do
If anyone is interested, I am formally inviting the Perl community to
examine a somewhat tested version of UI::Dialog.
Overall the code-base is complete and now feature-creep frozen and
fairly stable and straight forward. I've tried to maintain consistency
throughout the POD and code in terms of s
14 matches
Mail list logo
