On 11/5/04 8:00 PM, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 12:29:23AM +, Smylers wrote:
>> Nonetheless I feel it would be worth doing this for anything completely
>> independent. It may be a little more hassle for you to release a few
>> separate distros rather than one -- but it would
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 12:29:23AM +, Smylers wrote:
>
> Nonetheless I feel it would be worth doing this for anything completely
> independent. It may be a little more hassle for you to release a few
> separate distros rather than one -- but it would be a lot more hassle
> for a potential use
John Siracusa writes:
> * A set of DateTime utility functions
If these are generic DateTime utility functions, not tied into the rest
of your suite, then they ought to be released as part of the DateTime
namespace (or patched into existing modules in that namespace). But any
name in that namespa
I have a big collection of modules that are currently under the JCS::
namespace (my initials). Together, they are meant to form a sort of web
application construction kit. They're still under development, but I intend
to release them to CPAN eventually. I'm also considering releasing parts of
th
