* Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-01 22:25]:
> On Nov 1, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Dr.Ruud wrote:
>> I think it was Randal Schwartz who said something like: If the
>> answer involves threads, then the question was wrong.
>
> Most likely that quote comes from a year when multi-processor
> systems
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Even if suboptimal, Perl threads would seem likely to
>>behave more consistently across platforms.
>
> So the performance on Linux should be slowed down in order to deliver
> the same experience as on VMS? For which "target
# from David Golden
# on Saturday 01 November 2008 18:28:
>Even if suboptimal, Perl threads would seem likely to
>behave more consistently across platforms.
So the performance on Linux should be slowed down in order to deliver
the same experience as on VMS? For which "target audience" is that
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Dr.Ruud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> C
> :)
Given that the original post was about Padre -- a multi-platform IDE
for Perl -- forks may not be the best choice due to platform
differences. Even if suboptimal, Perl threads would seem likely to
behave more consistently
Chris Dolan schreef:
> Dr.Ruud:
>> Gabor Szabo:
>>> I guess we can implement everything with fork but I think -
>>> maybe because of my lack of experience in threads - that it will
>>> be better to use them than to fork.
>>
>> I think it was Randal Schwartz who said something like: If the answer
>
On Nov 1, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Dr.Ruud wrote:
Gabor Szabo schreef:
I guess we can implement everything with fork but I think -
maybe because of my lack of experience in threads - that it will
be better to use them than to fork.
I think it was Randal Schwartz who said something like: If the ans
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, I wouldn't use threads for this, but that doesn't make threading
> an unreasonable approach. I would use POE.
+1
I assume that POE::Loop::Wx should integrate into Padre pretty easily, yes?
-- David
* On Sat, Nov 01 2008, Dr.Ruud wrote:
> Gabor Szabo schreef:
>
>> I guess we can implement everything with fork but I think -
>> maybe because of my lack of experience in threads - that it will
>> be better to use them than to fork.
>
> I think it was Randal Schwartz who said something like: If the
On Nov 1, 2008, at 4:14 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 06:16:01PM -0500, Chris Dolan wrote:
Just add a dependency on thread::shared or one of the other threading
libraries. Push your problem up the chain!
No, not threads::shared
$ /home/nclark/Sandpit/588ish/bin/perl -Mth
Gabor Szabo schreef:
> I guess we can implement everything with fork but I think -
> maybe because of my lack of experience in threads - that it will
> be better to use them than to fork.
I think it was Randal Schwartz who said something like: If the answer
involves threads, then the question was
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nicholas Clark):
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 06:16:01PM -0500, Chris Dolan wrote:
> > Just add a dependency on thread::shared or one of the other threading
> > libraries. Push your problem up the chain!
>
> No, not threads::shared
>
> $ /home/nclark/Sandpit/588ish/bin/p
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 06:16:01PM -0500, Chris Dolan wrote:
> Just add a dependency on thread::shared or one of the other threading
> libraries. Push your problem up the chain!
No, not threads::shared
$ /home/nclark/Sandpit/588ish/bin/perl -Mthreads::shared -e0
$
threads looks a better idea:
12 matches
Mail list logo
