Re: RFC: Hump

2010-08-19 Thread Ricardo Signes
* Xiong Changnian [2010-08-15T07:02:29] > I'm looking to settle the namespace for a project (with the working > title 'hump', verb not noun). Tentative description: > > *::Hump - Perl project manager and command line valet The verb "hump" is a childish and crude word meaning "to have sex with."

Re: Advice wanted re Marpa::XS

2010-08-19 Thread David Cantrell
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:05:57PM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote: > I'm no C expert by any means, but the wise folks at #debian-devel have > mentioned that C99 is very portable, and even POSIX extensions are > "mostly portable" -- I guess it all depends if portability is more > important than your time

Re: Advice wanted re Marpa::XS

2010-08-19 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Thursday 19 August 2010 01:05:57 Jonathan Yu wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Kartik Thakore > > wrote: > > GCC extensions may not play well with the varying compilers out there. I > > think activestate uses a non gcc compiler. But C89 should be sufficient > > in terms of portability.