I'll see to it that the pony goes into blead asap.
Adam K
2008/10/4 Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 01:55:50PM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
>
>> The magic ponies will be introduced in 5.8.9 and 5.10.1. You indeed
>> will never have to upgrade.
>
> 5.8.9 will ship, poni
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Craig A. Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Steve Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, applied to bleadperl as 34446.
>>
>> Two local changes remain:
>>
>> Change 32357 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2007/11/17 04:19:47
>>
>>S
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 01:55:50PM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> The magic ponies will be introduced in 5.8.9 and 5.10.1. You indeed
> will never have to upgrade.
5.8.9 will ship, ponies ready or not.
I don't see stable ponies in blead to merge.
I'm not the only person who can commit to blead, s
2008/10/3 Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2008/9/30 Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> If the world upgraded regularly, Module::Build wouldn't be such a disaster
>>> anyway :)
>
> Adam Kennedy wrote:
>> True, but it's FAR more palatable to say "Just upgrade ONCE, and
>> you'll never ha
Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> 2008/9/30 Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> If the world upgraded regularly, Module::Build wouldn't be such a disaster
>>> anyway :)
>
> Adam Kennedy wrote:
>> True, but it's FAR more palatable to say "Just upgrade ONCE, and
>> you'll never have to think about it ag
> 2008/9/30 Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> If the world upgraded regularly, Module::Build wouldn't be such a disaster
>> anyway :)
Adam Kennedy wrote:
> True, but it's FAR more palatable to say "Just upgrade ONCE, and
> you'll never have to think about it again" compared to upgrading
> conti
True, but it's FAR more palatable to say "Just upgrade ONCE, and
you'll never have to think about it again" compared to upgrading
continuously.
Adam K
2008/9/30 Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If the world upgraded regularly, Module::Build wouldn't be such a disaster
> anyway :)
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Steve Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, applied to bleadperl as 34446.
>
> Two local changes remain:
>
> Change 32357 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2007/11/17 04:19:47
>
>Skip Module::Build ppm test -- not ready for prime time on VMS.
>
> (ppm.t)
>
> Chang
John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Jos I. Boumans wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:51 AM, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.vmsperl/2008/06/msg14821.html
>>>
>>> The main problem is that Archive::Tar needs a patch to properly be
>>> able to pack a VMS bi
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Steve Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blead is now updated to Archive-Tar-1.39_04 in #34452.
>
> One local change remains in blead:
>
> Change 32352 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2007/11/16 23:46:13
>
>The new Archive::Tar tests are TODO on VMS for reasons unrel
Jos I. Boumans wrote:
Hi John,
On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:51 AM, John E. Malmberg wrote:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.vmsperl/2008/06/msg14821.html
The main problem is that Archive::Tar needs a patch to properly be
able to pack a VMS binary into a tarball.
We were waiting for word from J
Steve Hay wrote:
Ken Williams wrote:
Hi all,
After much tireless work by Eric Wilhelm and lots of feedback from
patient & nonpatient users alike, I'm pleased to announce that version
0.30 of Module::Build is now on CPAN. This is the first non-beta
release in a long time.
Thanks, applied to b
Hi John,
On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:51 AM, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
Ken Williams wrote:
Hi all,
After much tireless work by Eric Wilhelm and lots of feedback from
patient & nonpatient users alike, I'm pleased to announce that
version
0.30 of Module::Build is now on CPAN. This i
Ken Williams wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After much tireless work by Eric Wilhelm and lots of feedback from
> patient & nonpatient users alike, I'm pleased to announce that version
> 0.30 of Module::Build is now on CPAN. This is the first non-beta
> release in a long time.
Thanks, applied to bleadperl
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:07:47AM -0400, David Golden wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Adam Kennedy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As far as I'm concerned, configure_requires doesn't exist until
> > there's prod release of both CPAN.pm and CPANPLUS that support it.
> >
> > Once there is
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 04:16:33PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Matt, I've met a lot of people who don't use Module::Build because you said
> not to use it. They usually don't know why. There's already enough FUD
> flying around without adding to it. Please either give us specifics we can
>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:33:09AM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was told it was a planned feature when KWILLIAMS turned up on london.pm
> > and yelled "FUD" because I was complaining about users' problems in the
> > real
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Adam Kennedy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I'm concerned, configure_requires doesn't exist until
> there's prod release of both CPAN.pm and CPANPLUS that support it.
>
> Once there is, THEN we can draw a line under it, call it done, and
> start recommending
On Sunday 28 September 2008 06:38:44 Matt S Trout wrote:
> Never mind, I'll go back to waiting for it to be five years from now and
> the toolchain to have worked round this brain damage.
That's not helpful. When a project doesn't release a new version, some people
say "Oh, don't use it! They
2008/9/29 Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Rather than a brute force "bundle your dependencies" there is now
> configure_requires. You can set configure_requires => { 'Module::Build' =>
> X.YY } in your Build.PL and an up-to-date CPAN shell will do the right thing.
> We've pressed hard to
Matt S Trout wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 07:53:07PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> Matt S Trout wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:01:19PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
Hi all,
After much tireless work by Eric Wilhelm and lots of feedback from
patient & nonpatient users
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 07:53:07PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Matt S Trout wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:01:19PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> After much tireless work by Eric Wilhelm and lots of feedback from
> >> patient & nonpatient users alike, I'm pleased to
Matt S Trout wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:01:19PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After much tireless work by Eric Wilhelm and lots of feedback from
>> patient & nonpatient users alike, I'm pleased to announce that version
>> 0.30 of Module::Build is now on CPAN. This is the fir
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was told it was a planned feature when KWILLIAMS turned up on london.pm
> and yelled "FUD" because I was complaining about users' problems in the
> real world rather than the problems of an ideal user that somehow magicall
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:01:19PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After much tireless work by Eric Wilhelm and lots of feedback from
> patient & nonpatient users alike, I'm pleased to announce that version
> 0.30 of Module::Build is now on CPAN. This is the first non-beta
> release in a
25 matches
Mail list logo
