Re: Devel::Autoflush failures

2008-07-17 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:45, Ken Williams wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:37 PM, David E. Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Checking prerequisites... Invalid prerequisite condition '4.e-02' for Pod::Readme at lib/Module/Build/Base.pm line 1262. What did your dependency line for Pod::Readme

Re: Devel::Autoflush failures

2008-07-17 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:37, David E. Wheeler wrote: On Jul 17, 2008, at 03:54, John Peacock wrote: Are you seeing that with 0.2808_02, 'cause I'm not? Bah! I had only installed it for perl 5.10. Stupid! Sorry. Just installed it for 5.6.2, and now I get this: benedict% /usr/local/perl-5.6.2/

Re: Devel::Autoflush failures

2008-07-17 Thread Ken Williams
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:37 PM, David E. Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Checking prerequisites... > Invalid prerequisite condition '4.e-02' for Pod::Readme at > lib/Module/Build/Base.pm line 1262. What did your dependency line for Pod::Readme in the Build.PL look like? -Ken

Re: Devel::Autoflush failures

2008-07-17 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 17, 2008, at 03:54, John Peacock wrote: Are you seeing that with 0.2808_02, 'cause I'm not? Bah! I had only installed it for perl 5.10. Stupid! Sorry. Just installed it for 5.6.2, and now I get this: benedict% /usr/local/perl-5.6.2/bin/perl Build.PL Checking whether your kit is comple

Re: Devel::Autoflush failures

2008-07-17 Thread John Peacock
David E. Wheeler wrote: So if I understand correctly, that just leaves the version comparison issues I reported, yes? http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.module.build/2008/07/msg1418.html Are you seeing that with 0.2808_02, 'cause I'm not? It doesn't have anything to do with the version o

Re: Devel::Autoflush failures

2008-07-16 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 16, 2008, at 19:58, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: Thanks, this indeed solved the problem. I've now installed both CPAN::Reporter 1.16_51 and Module::Build 0.2808_02 on most of my smokers. The first PASS has arrived: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2008/07/msg1902249.html So

Re: Devel::Autoflush failures

2008-07-16 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:50:31 -0400, "David Golden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ah - that'll be the problem with mod_perl2 - apxs is written in Perl and >> uses sysperl. > I have some new ideas for how

Re: Devel::Autoflush failures

2008-07-16 Thread David Golden
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah - that'll be the problem with mod_perl2 - apxs is written in Perl and > uses sysperl. I have some new ideas for how to make PERL5OPT="-MDevel::Autoflush" more friendly for multi-perl environments. Let me try to get a

Re: Devel::Autoflush failures

2008-07-16 Thread Andy Armstrong
On 16 Jul 2008, at 05:03, David Golden wrote: CPAN::Reporter versions 1.15_56 and 1.16 had broken implementations. 1.1601 is "fine" -- that said, things can still break if running some custom perl (not first in path) and some script calls 'perl' that doesn't have Devel::Autoflush installed. If y

Re: Devel::Autoflush failures

2008-07-15 Thread David Golden
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # from Ken Williams > # on Tuesday 15 July 2008 20:10: > >>> How horribly bizarre. We don't even use Devel::Autoflush anywhere. >>> Maybe it's some Test:: module barfing? >> >>Actually, suspiciously, CPAN::Reporter seems t

Re: Devel::Autoflush failures

2008-07-15 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Ken Williams # on Tuesday 15 July 2008 20:10: >> How horribly bizarre.  We don't even use Devel::Autoflush anywhere. >> Maybe it's some Test:: module barfing? > >Actually, suspiciously, CPAN::Reporter seems to be what uses >Devel::Autoflush.  Is this part of the problem? A PERL5OPT conflic