On Apr 23, 2007, at 3:45 PM, John Peacock wrote:
I would strongly recommend releasing a new point release for
Module::Build with
the updated version code, so that unnecessary test failures won't
be a nuisance
for other modules.
Done.
-Ken
Ken Williams wrote:
> This isn't ideal, because it means we would have a full-fledged
> dependency on version.pm, rather than the embedded copy we have now.
But only in bleadperl and 5.10.0, where the version object code is part of the
core as well, meaning the embedded pure Perl version.pm code w
On Apr 23, 2007, at 3:45 PM, John Peacock wrote:
Rather than changing the
core Module::Build code to call version->new() instead of
Module::Build::Version->new(), it make more sense to leave the
M::B::V module as
is, but eliminate all of the duplicated version code. Essentially,
all that i
