[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the To, Cc, and Newsgroups headers for details. ]]
In article
CAOeq1c9DinChM6+oV_eg=oz9yftj5oygws-bztoa-en9twb...@mail.gmail.com,
David Golden x...@xdg.me wrote:
Unless I hear violent objection (accompanied with a volunteer to take
over
With the improved spam filters in place, I've seen almost no spam
applications for quite a while.
The applications I still deny tend to be Perl users applying for a
PAUSE account because they think they need one or just want one,
without saying they intend to upload anything.
Even with my canned
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:45:18AM -0400, David Golden wrote:
Unless I hear violent objection (accompanied with a volunteer to take
over registration responsibilities), this will be my approval policy
going forward.
+1
--
Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit
On Apr 9, 2013, at 6:45, David Golden x...@xdg.me wrote:
PAUSE ID's cost very little to provide. I see no reason to deny
anyone's application as long as they seem human and mention Perl.
They get an email address and a link from the CPAN sites and could use both for
spam.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen a...@perl.org wrote:
On Apr 9, 2013, at 6:45, David Golden x...@xdg.me wrote:
PAUSE ID's cost very little to provide. I see no reason to deny
anyone's application as long as they seem human and mention Perl.
They get an email address and a
PAUSE ID's cost very little to provide. I see no reason to deny
anyone's application as long as they seem human and mention Perl.
No problem, although I think it would be wise if the approval message
included a short explanation where PAUSE ID's should be used for.
-- Johan
