Greetings,
Upon further reflection, I feel that the name
Dancer::Plugin::Legacy::Routing is more appropriate.
Dancer::Plugin::Legacy is too broad and is hogging too much namespace.
I apologies for the confusion and I hope a member of the list can make this
change.
Much appreciated!
Best
Hi Robert
I hope a member of the list can make this
change.
Nope. /You/ do that by uploading a re-named module and deleting the
original, all via the PAUSE web site.
Cheers
--
Ron Savage
http://savage.net.au/
The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
modid: Dancer::Plugin::Legacy::Routing
DSLIP: adpfp
description: Support and Denote Deprecated Routes
userid: DRZIGMAN (Robert Stone)
chapterid: 16 (Server_and_Daemon_Utilities)
communities:
Hi Robert
OK. Thanx for the follow-up.
On 31/01/14 10:58, Robert Stone wrote:
Greetings,
I apologize for not being more clear.
I was referring to my application to register the errantly named namespace
of Dancer::Plugin::Legacy. I am not able to Edit Module Metadata on an
unapproved
Oops, I clicked the registration link because I thought I was looking
at the wrong message. :(
--
brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org
PAUSE instructions: http://pause.perl.org/pause/query?ACTION=pause_04about
Archives: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules
Greetings,
I apologize for not being more clear.
I was referring to my application to register the errantly named namespace
of Dancer::Plugin::Legacy. I am not able to Edit Module Metadata on an
unapproved namespace, which means I'm afraid I can not mark it as Can Be
Deleted from database.
The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
modid: Dancer::Plugin::Legacy
DSLIP: adpfp
description: Support and Denote Deprecated Routes
userid: DRZIGMAN (Robert Stone)
chapterid: 16 (Server_and_Daemon_Utilities)
communities:
similar:
