[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article
,
Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Ron Savage wrote:
> > Hi Lubomir
> >
> > Your module's name is really a bit too short. People will have trouble
> > s
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:07:57PM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > WL is absolutely meaningless on first sight as a namespace. Expanding the
> > acronym or adding a qualifier for what area it related to would be good.
> >
> > WL as a namespace on its own is terrible.
>
> Do you have a better sugg
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Matt S Trout wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:48:02AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
>> CPAN search also looks in module abstracts.
>
> That doesn't mean you shouldn't try and pick a good name.
What makes you believe I did not try?
>> > A better name would be P
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:48:02AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> CPAN search also looks in module abstracts.
That doesn't mean you shouldn't try and pick a good name.
> > A better name would be Protocol::WL, since that namespace is already in use
> > on PAUSE.
>
> See the module submission mail
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Ron Savage wrote:
> Hi Lubomir
>
> Your module's name is really a bit too short. People will have trouble
> searching for it.
CPAN search also looks in module abstracts.
> A better name would be Protocol::WL, since that namespace is already in use
> on PAUSE.
Se
Hi Lubomir
Your module's name is really a bit too short. People will have trouble
searching for it.
A better name would be Protocol::WL, since that namespace is already in
use on PAUSE.
Also, PAUSE has help on naming modules:
http://pause.perl.org/pause/query?ACTION=pause_namingmodules
--
The next version of the Module List will list the following module:
modid: WL
DSLIP: bdpOp
description: Perl Wayland protocol binding
userid: LKUNDRAK (Lubomir Rintel)
chapterid: 18 (Images_Pixmaps_Bitmaps)
enteredby: BDFOY (brian d foy)
enteredon: Tue Nov 19
