Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Ken" == Ken MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ken> A little background first. SAX modules come in three basic
> Ken> flavors, "drivers" which generate SAX events (parsers are
> Ken> drivers), "handlers" which consume SAX events
> "Ken" == Ken MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ken> A little background first. SAX modules come in three basic
Ken> flavors, "drivers" which generate SAX events (parsers are
Ken> drivers), "handlers" which consume SAX events (writers and
Ken> tree builders are handlers), a
[I missed this in an earlier response until Michael's more recent post
reminded me of it.]
"Eric Bresie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So please indicate your preference:
> >
> > 1) SAX::*::* or SAX*::*
> >
> > 2) no-sub-types or sub-types
> Since SAX = Simple API for XML...should thi
Michael Koehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So the question we have :
>
> The Java implementation of SAX 2.0 is out, and it improve in some
> important concepts as the namespace thing, filters, and document
> order. Ken had mad XML::Parser::PerlSAX as a part of his
> libxmlperl, provi
