Am Dienstag, den 02.01.2007, 13:29 -0800 schrieb Drew Bertola:
> > for ( e = APR_BRIGADE_FIRST(bb) ;
> > e != APR_BRIGADE_SENTINEL(bb) ;
> > e = APR_BUCKET_NEXT(e) ) {
> - create context if it doesn't already exist.
> - loop through buckets (from FIRST to SENTINEL) in brigade pa
Drew Bertola wrote:
Again, makes me wish for a null output filter example.
Try this link - it was written about 6 years ago, but still applies.
It's a Ryan Bloom article (he was one of the APR developers). The link :
http://www.serverwatch.com/news/article.php/1127731
My understanding i
Joachim Zobel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 02.01.2007, 01:14 -0800 schrieb Drew Bertola:
>
>> line 91 looks like this:
>>
>> apr_bucket_read(e, &str, &len, APR_NONBLOCK_READ);
>>
>> Also, it only happens if I use
>>
>> APR_BRIGADE_INSERT_TAIL(ctx->bb, e);
>>
>
> Ah, understood
Am Dienstag, den 02.01.2007, 13:15 -0800 schrieb Drew Bertola:
> I made a mental note to revisit apr_strmatch and friends. I have to
> find an example of how to allocate the pool used in the precompile.
I doubt that this is worth the effort, but a child init handler, that
initialises a static wou
Joe Lewis wrote:
> Make SURE you are not using things like strcasestr - it is not
> platform independent (requires GNU source definitions). Besides, you
> may want to change that to a series of apr_strmatch_precompile and
> apr_strmatch commands to do the searching - those take an additional
> par
Am Dienstag, den 02.01.2007, 01:14 -0800 schrieb Drew Bertola:
> line 91 looks like this:
>
> apr_bucket_read(e, &str, &len, APR_NONBLOCK_READ);
>
> Also, it only happens if I use
>
> APR_BRIGADE_INSERT_TAIL(ctx->bb, e);
Ah, understood.
You don't mention this, but you probably
Drew Bertola wrote:
while ( i < len )
{
ap_fputc(f->next, ctx->bb, str[i++]);
}
This is a performance hog.
With this, I don't have the segfaults anymore.
html is ok too.
--
Drew
I would expect it to be a performance h
Joachim Zobel wrote:
> Am Montag, den 01.01.2007, 06:18 -0800 schrieb Drew Bertola:
>
>> This generates segfaults when processing php and doesn't help with my
>> problem. Is the problem due to filter order?
>>
>
> To find out more about the segf's do
[snip - thanks]
I'm confused about
