Re: Putting a server into maintance

2008-03-18 Thread Augie Schwer
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Ben Ragg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Two we've found really useful... "Ack All" to ack everything in the > current view and a hold feature... so we can stop alerts going out for > up to 180 mins (but still see what's failed). The hold feature includes > who put

Re: Putting a server into maintance

2008-03-18 Thread Augie Schwer
Darn auto-complete. -- Forwarded message -- From: Augie Schwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:44 PM Subject: Re: Putting a server into maintance To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Chris Hoogendyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > at some poin

Re: Putting a server into maintance

2008-03-18 Thread Ben Ragg
Over time we've been slowly modifying the code a little and adding our own features. Two we've found really useful... "Ack All" to ack everything in the current view and a hold feature... so we can stop alerts going out for up to 180 mins (but still see what's failed). The hold feature includes

Re: Putting a server into maintance

2008-03-18 Thread Chris Hoogendyk
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:07:38PM -0400, > Ed Ravin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > a message of 23 lines which said: > >> In most cases, our engineers log into Mon and use the "host disable" >> or "service disable" to stop montoring the stuff that's about to go >>

Re: Putting a server into maintance

2008-03-18 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:07:38PM -0400, Ed Ravin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 23 lines which said: > In most cases, our engineers log into Mon and use the "host disable" > or "service disable" to stop montoring the stuff that's about to go > down, and re-enable them when the mainten