ahmad faheem escribió:
i'm ahmed faheem, a final year student, Computer Systems Engineering
Dept, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandraia Univ., Egypt.
my final project team wants to contribute to Mono Project. We are a set
of self-motivated people who are very enthusiastic to build a good
On 07/13/06 Kornél Pál wrote:
I reallized that simply redirecting the method may not be a good solution
because the .ctor method is lost from the stack trace this way. And I think
other problems may occur altough I never experienced such problems.
I attached an extended version of the
Hi,
I understand what are talking about but I don't really understand how this
affects my patch.:)
This patch would make the runtime to avoid any unmanaged code in these three
string .ctors (other string .ctors could simply redirected as well but
currently there is no use to do so). Strings
On 7/17/06, Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My personal opinion is that the best priority should be to finish the
port of MonoDevelop to Windows. I think this goal would make Mono take
off on many fields (nowadays, it is very difficult to convince people
about using a
Hi,
Attached a minor patch for review for
System.Resources.SatelliteContractVersionAttribute. The MS.NET
implementation, apart from null argument checking, don't check for a
valid version number and allows arbitrary strings as valid versions.
Attached patch just changed the internal Version
My 2 cents would be to get SWF to a good state and then port
MonoDevelop to that so that it can be cross platform rather than
wasting time porting it
Martin
On 7/17/06, Ivan N. Zlatev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/17/06, Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My personal
Martin Hinks escribió:
My 2 cents would be to get SWF to a good state and then port
MonoDevelop to that so that it can be cross platform rather than
wasting time porting it
Port MonoDevelop to SWF? If you want that kind of IDE, use SharpDevelop.
Besides, AFAIK the issues about porting MD
Oh, maybe I made a rash assumption - I assumed it was a gtk with
Windows thing. My main gripe with MonoDevelop is that the official IDE
for cross-platform .NET is not cross-platform.
Martin
On 7/17/06, Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Hinks escribió:
My 2 cents
Martin Hinks escribió:
My main gripe with MonoDevelop is that the official IDE
for cross-platform .NET is not cross-platform.
Yes, that's the same thing I claimed when I wrote nowadays, it is very
difficult to convince people about using a multiplatform development
tool whose own IDE is not
I'm doing some testing of my COM Interop work, and I'm hitting a problem on Linux. The CustomMarshalers assembly does not seem to get installed in the GAC on linux, however on windows it does. Is this intentional, as I'd like to be able to use them on Linux as well. As a sample, the following
Hello,
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 15:33 +0200, Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]
wrote:
Martin Hinks escribió:
My main gripe with MonoDevelop is that the official IDE
for cross-platform .NET is not cross-platform.
Yes, that's the same thing I claimed when I wrote nowadays, it is very
difficult
On pon, 2006-07-17 at 15:01 -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote:
Martin Hinks escribió:
My main gripe with MonoDevelop is that the official IDE
for cross-platform .NET is not cross-platform.
Yes, that's the same thing I claimed when I wrote nowadays, it
Ok, got everything sorted out with some help. The assembly currently isn't being built. So, can I propose that I1. Change folder name from Custommarshalers to CustomMarshalers2. Change assembly name to correctly be
CustomMarshalers.dll instead of
Hello Jesse,
I had a chance to debug the mod_mono code today and I determined that there
is nothing
wrong with the code. Instead, the functionality I was looking for exists but
is undocumented.
It looks like I forgot to mention in the above blurb that I need to run
ASP.NET 2.0 code
so
Hello,
My personal opinion is that the best priority should be to finish the
port of MonoDevelop to Windows. I think this goal would make Mono take
off on many fields (nowadays, it is very difficult to convince people
about using a multiplatform development tool whose own IDE is not
Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote:
My personal opinion is that the best priority should be to finish the
port of MonoDevelop to Windows.
Instead of porting things back and forth (MD was started as SharpDevelop
port) it would be just great if the contribution would make our life
easier.
Yes, thats fine.
Zoltan
On 7/17/06, Jon Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, got everything sorted out with some help. The assembly currently isn't
being built. So, can I propose that I
1. Change folder name from Custommarshalers to CustomMarshalers
2. Change assembly name to correctly
Well, my program has run for at least a week now, and it just now gave up the
ghost. I now have a screen full of these messages:
-
** (/opt/MyProgram/MyProgram.exe:2603): WARNING **: _wapi_handle_unref:
Attempting to unref unused handle 0x1
-
They are
Brian Crowell wrote:
-
** (/opt/MyProgram/MyProgram.exe:2603): WARNING **: _wapi_handle_unref:
Attempting to unref unused handle 0x1
-
Sorry. According to http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=78241, this has
been repaired in a build after mine.
Piotr Zurek wrote:
Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote:
My personal opinion is that the best priority should be to finish the
port of MonoDevelop to Windows.
Instead of porting things back and forth (MD was started as SharpDevelop
port) it would be just great if the contribution would
20 matches
Mail list logo
