On 8/29/06, Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, Gtk# Split As part of Gtk# becoming one of the supported language bindings in the Gnome platform and Tomboy, a Gtk#-based application, becoming part of the Gnome desktop, Gtk# has been split up into multiple packages, instead
Daniel,
How is this relevant to Nick's post? Visual Studio has nothing at
all to do with the App_Code compilation that occurs in ASP.NET 2.0...
I would say it is advisable to properly read someone's message before
responding and making all kinds of assumptions.
-- Thomas Johansen
On 31/0
So, let's say I want to develop a filesystem to be integrated with our
software: should I use SULF or should I wait for Mono.Fuse?
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Pryor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paolo Molaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 3:51 AM
Subject:
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 18:07 +0200, Paolo Molaro wrote:
> > The biggest problem with the mono module is that no headers are
> > installed, making it difficult to make use of libMonoPosixHelper.so.
>
> This is for a good reason. libMonoPosixHelper.so is an internal
> implementation detail, it is not
Hi,
As I have been packaging apps for Fedora Extras, I seem to have gathered
patch files so that the applications are properly architecture agnostic.
Currently, I have patches for...
boo
ikvm
monodebugger
monodevelop
monodoc
xsp
The alterations mean that on a native 64 bit box, libraries and dl
Hi Pablo,
> licenses included in zip files: license.rft for NUnit and
> license.txt for log4net
Thanks!
Charlie
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Hi Pablo,
> > Have you actually modified NUnit? Looking solely at the
> zips, because
> > I'm a little pressed for time right now, it appears that
> you build on
> > top of NUnit, rather than actually modifying it.
>
> Well, now that you say, if I remember correctly I made an
> small modifi
Hello Andrés,
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 22:46 +0200, "Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]"
wrote:
> Hi! Interesting discussion; see inline,
>
>
> Sebastien Pouliot wrote:
> > Second, there are scenarios where FullTrust|Nothing is a valid choice.
> > In fact this is what people do when manually downloadi
Hello Christian,
> after talking to Sebastien about another issue I'd like to see changed
> the topic "globalization" came up. I think I found a solution which
> may bring globalization to gendarme with just a few changes and also
> fixing the other issue I had :-).
>
> The attached patch is an
licenses included in zip files: license.rft for NUnit and license.txt for
log4net
- Original Message -
From: "Charlie Poole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'pablosantosluac'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 9:30 PM
Subject: RE: [Mono-dev] Distributed Unit Testing
> Hi
Hi,
> This looks pretty cool! Mono could probably use this, since there
> are so many test, and we (the NUnit team) would be interested
> to hear more about it as well. We're looking at similar things, but
> your ideas are welcome - and so are you and your code!
Please, feel free to use it... :-)
Hi! Interesting discussion; see inline,
Sebastien Pouliot wrote:
> Second, there are scenarios where FullTrust|Nothing is a valid choice.
> In fact this is what people do when manually downloading and executing
> any application (mono or not). So it all comes down to the "untrusted
> source" and,
Hello all,
currently there are 4 interfaces for rules: IAssemblyRule, IModuleRule, ITypeRule and IMethodRule. Each one declares a method which looks like this:
IList Check (IAssemblyDefinition ad, ...);
The return value IList contains a list of objects. If this return value is null it means th
Hi all,
after talking to Sebastien about another issue I'd like to see changed the topic "globalization" came up. I think I found a solution which may bring globalization to gendarme with just a few changes and also fixing the other issue I had :-).
The attached patch is an example translation
Hi Pablo,
This looks pretty cool! Mono could probably use this, since there
are so many test, and we (the NUnit team) would be interested
to hear more about it as well. We're looking at similar things, but
your ideas are welcome - and so are you and your code!
Have you actually modified NUnit? Lo
Hi Vladimir,
Can you give us more details about why are telling the headers go wild?
>From the little you show, the headers look normal for an email with
attachments. Such emails must be of the multipart variety, and each
attachment has it's own headers prepended to them and are separated
from ea
Hi Sebastien,
> > I have no idea whether .net prebuild would help me or just
> give me a
> > fifth build option, but it's intriguing enough an idea that
> I plan to
> > take a look.
>
> Please share your findings :-)
> Learning by example is much easier ;-)
I will. Now I only have to find t
Hello Charlie,
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 09:03 -0700, Charlie Poole wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> > It's funny how many build system suggestions you can get. A
> > few more days and we will have more (possible) build system
> > than rules for gendarme ;-)
>
> I sympathize. NUnit has three different
Visual Studio.net is an IDE which automatically adds
references to many assemblies in the project file.
Mono/XSP/mcs are not an IDE; they are the CLI runtime,
web server, and C# compiler. This can be compared to
Microsoft's CLR/IIS/csc.
Have you tried building your ASP.NET projects without
the
Hello Michael,
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 11:31 -0500, Michael Schurter wrote:
> Sebastien Pouliot wrote:
> > Hello Ted,
> >
> > On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 00:44 -0400, ted leslie wrote:
> > ...
> >> "write for any purpose, write once, run anywhere"
> >> and unfortunately mono has not provided a means to u
We use ClickOnce internally and wouldn't roll without it; it rocks to say the least.
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 11:31 -0500, Michael Schurter wrote:
Sebastien Pouliot wrote:
> Hello Ted,
>
> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 00:44 -0400, ted leslie wrote:
> ...
>> "write for any purpose, write once, run an
Sebastien Pouliot wrote:
> Hello Ted,
>
> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 00:44 -0400, ted leslie wrote:
> ...
>> "write for any purpose, write once, run anywhere"
>> and unfortunately mono has not provided a means to use it as a browser
>> plugin like Java. For me i could go for just a plugin to Firefox (l
Hi,
We needed to test our software on a distributed scenario. We have developed
an small extension to NUnit.
We think maybe somebody can find it interesting, so we have published the
source code, an example and a short description at our website. You can find
it at pnunit.codicesoftware.com.
Trimmed the CC list to only include mono-devel-list.
On 08/29/06 Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> Once I started writing Mono.Fuse, I discovered a good reason to avoid
> Mono.Posix: it's currently impossible to use from outside of Mono.
> I figured this would be a good opportunity to rectify that, making i
Hi Sebastien,
> It's funny how many build system suggestions you can get. A
> few more days and we will have more (possible) build system
> than rules for gendarme ;-)
I sympathize. NUnit has three different builds: VS2003, VS2005
and NAnt. I'm constantly forgetting to update one of them. Jami
Hubert FONGARNAND wrote:
> I've talk with Robert Jordan, and he doesn't understant why you can't
> reproduce the bug... He can reproduce the bug, and we've find the
> solution, he's making a patch in order to place mono-service.exe into
> the GAC (like XSP)
I've made an addendum to that bug rep
Le mercredi 30 août 2006 à 11:17 -0400, Miguel de Icaza a écrit :
Hello,
> You should take note that mono-service based program doesn't work with
> this version...
As I pointed out in the bug you filed, am unable to reproduce the
problem; Please update the bug.
I've talk with Robert Jor
Hello,
> This problem is currently stopping people wanting to run ASP.NET 2.0
> code on mono.
Please file a bug report.
This problem is stopping ASP.NET 2.0 users, but this is not the only
problem that will stop them, there are plenty more.
> I wouldn't mind taking a look at fixing / developing
Hello,
> You should take note that mono-service based program doesn't work with
> this version...
As I pointed out in the bug you filed, am unable to reproduce the
problem; Please update the bug.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.x
Sebastien Pouliot wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 14:45 +0200, Robert Jordan wrote:
>
>> About Mono's plugin: w/out a working CAS it's grossly negligent
>> to even think about an implementation that allows the execution
>> of assemblies from untrusted sources. Even if they were signed
>> with God's
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 14:45 +0200, Robert Jordan wrote:
> About Mono's plugin: w/out a working CAS it's grossly negligent
> to even think about an implementation that allows the execution
> of assemblies from untrusted sources. Even if they were signed
> with God's own key, they still were insecur
Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 10:20 +0100, Ben O'Steen wrote:
>>> when i am talking "in a browser" i am talking about stuff that you can't
>>> handle with asp.net, like a full fledged arcade game (to take it to an
>>> extreme), a video/audio playing client, the power to properly sy
Hello Ted,
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 00:44 -0400, ted leslie wrote:
...
> "write for any purpose, write once, run anywhere"
> and unfortunately mono has not provided a means to use it as a browser
> plugin like Java. For me i could go for just a plugin to Firefox (linux
> and Win32), wouldnt even need
Hey,
It's funny how many build system suggestions you can get. A few more
days and we will have more (possible) build system than rules for
gendarme ;-)
However it's a little sad when I compare this number with the offers to
maintaining (versus just naming a tool, or dropping a patch) the new
bui
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 10:20 +0100, Ben O'Steen wrote:
> On Wed, August 30, 2006 09:58, ted leslie wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > when i am talking "in a browser" i am talking about stuff that you can't
> > handle with asp.net, like a full fledged arcade game (to take it to an
> > extreme), a video/audio
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 23:12 -0700, Valient Gough wrote:
> I've responded separately to Jon because I find his comments inflammatory.
The only inflammatory bit was saying that I didn't like the SULF API.
Which is about as inflammatory as saying Java collections suck (no
language integration like
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 10:20 +0100, Ben O'Steen wrote:
> > when i am talking "in a browser" i am talking about stuff that you can't
> > handle with asp.net, like a full fledged arcade game (to take it to an
> > extreme), a video/audio playing client, the power to properly sync video
> > and audio,
Hi,
I did hold out some hope that 1.1.17 would address this, but it seems not. :(
If you use Namespace="xx" in an aspx file, the mono asp.net parser
expects an Assembly attribute to accompany it. With ASP.NET 2.0 this
isn't required as code gets automagically compiled.
This problem is currently
Why not use .net prebuild?
It can generate nant, vs2003, vs2005, monodevelop, and sharpdevelop
projects/solutions from a single xml definition. This cuts down maintenance
of project files quite tremendously. It is here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/dnpb/
This can be used during tarball cr
it would be better probably if you send mono questions to the gtk-sharp
list. They'll be able to help better than us. In fact, we have the mono
bindings in our source tree because they were moved from GTK#, so it
would be nice to have them working.
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 19:25 -0500, Daniel Espinos
On Wed, August 30, 2006 09:58, ted leslie wrote:
[snip]
>
> when i am talking "in a browser" i am talking about stuff that you can't
> handle with asp.net, like a full fledged arcade game (to take it to an
> extreme), a video/audio playing client, the power to properly sync video
> and audio, inte
The thread is about a language (platform) allowing one to do most
anything, adding Flash to the mix immediately defeats the purpose.
I use asp.net, great for many things
when i am talking "in a browser" i am talking about stuff that you can't
handle with asp.net, like a full fledged arcade
You should take note that mono-service based program doesn't work with this version...
Le mardi 29 août 2006 à 16:43 -0400, Miguel de Icaza a écrit :
Hello,
Mono 1.1.17 has been released.
Full release notes:
www.go-mono.com/archive/1.1.17
Mono was branched at version 1.1.13 t
From: damien churchill
Sent: 30 August 2006 08:11
To: 'Justin Dearing'
Subject: RE: [Mono-dev] Mono
1.1.17 has been released.
Yeah if you
write your program in classes then it’s easy enough just to make a gui
for both web and desktop using asp/gtk whatever.
Don't mean to start a flame war here, but if you want the write once run anywhere in a browser. If you can't do it in AJAX, do it in flash.Secondly, have you heard of ASP.NET, The equivilant of JSP for .NET. Mono's support is pretty good.
Aside from needing C for linux kernel programming,what wou
45 matches
Mail list logo
