Re: [Mono-dev] FastCGI Performance

2014-04-09 Thread Sergey Zhukov
Thank you too, etienne, for testing and commiting bug fixes. On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 21:33 +0200, etienne.champet...@free.fr wrote: Hi This thread is named FastCGI performance, but much more important than performance is stablility, ie don't explode (10Gb memory usage :)). I want to

Re: [Mono-dev] FastCGI Performance

2014-04-09 Thread Sergey Zhukov
Marcello, I'll try to find a way to remove ASP.NET dependency, in this case you'll be able to reuse communication part of the HyperFastCgi and provide an additional way to write FastCgi http servers. On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:01 -0300, Marcelo Zabani wrote: xplicit, perhaps we could concentrate

[Mono-dev] Ongoing Mono development / Mono roadmap

2014-04-09 Thread Alex J Lennon
Hi, I became involved in a conversation today on LinkedIn in which a commentator was telling me Mono is dead, due to contractual constraints imposed on Xamarin by the legal owners of Mono, Attachmate. A snippet of the ensuing conversation follows, In July 2011, however, Novell - now a

Re: [Mono-dev] FastCGI Performance

2014-04-09 Thread xplicit
I like this. If it provides the ability to easy change one listener to other and also ability to change HTTP servers it'll be awesome. By the way it also should provide the ability to run current ASP.NET server otherwise people could not migrate their web application to Linux platform. ASP.NET

Re: [Mono-dev] Ongoing Mono development / Mono roadmap

2014-04-09 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
Facts tells a lot more gossip. Mono has been steadily growing since Xamarin started. The size of the core team working on mono have expanded and the number of external contributors is growing even faster. On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Alex J Lennon ajlen...@dynamicdevices.co.uk wrote:

Re: [Mono-dev] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Ongoing Mono development / Mono roadmap

2014-04-09 Thread Alex J Lennon
On 09/04/2014 22:00, Robert Jordan wrote: Were you living under a stone the past couple of years? :D Just trying to understand the realities Robert :-D You're mixing up Mono MonoTouch like they were the same

Re: [Mono-dev] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Ongoing Mono development / Mono roadmap

2014-04-09 Thread Robert Jordan
On 09.04.2014 23:17, Alex J Lennon wrote: A key component of what I was told toay is that Xamarin are unable to work on Mono due to contractual obligations to Attachmate. As a result they are (I am told) abandoning Mono and doing something else which is the (presumably) VM underneath the

Re: [Mono-dev] ***UNCHECKED*** RE: Re: Ongoing Mono development / Mono roadmap

2014-04-09 Thread Alex J Lennon
On 09/04/2014 22:27, Chris Tacke wrote: If you take a look at the live repository for Mono, you can see that Xamarin employees regularly update the source code (there are changes from 2 hours

Re: [Mono-dev] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Ongoing Mono development / Mono roadmap

2014-04-09 Thread Chris Tacke
If you take a look at the live repository for Mono, you can see that Xamarin employees regularly update the source code (there are changes from 2 hours ago). That places the statement that Xamarin are unable to work on Mono clearly into the FUD column. Mono is actively being fixed and

Re: [Mono-dev] ***UNCHECKED*** RE: Re: Ongoing Mono development / Mono roadmap

2014-04-09 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (mono)
From: mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-devel-list- boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Alex J Lennon Many thanks for bringing clarity to this for me Chris. As we're in a public forum I hope hope you won't mind me referencing this discussion now and in future when it

Re: [Mono-dev] NFS mounts ignored on Linux

2014-04-09 Thread David Curylo
Just checking on this, as I didn’t really get any feedback. Do I need to open a defect to have this pull request merged or is there something else I need to do so the maintainer of io.c notices it? On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:19 AM, David Curylo cury...@asme.org wrote: I came across the behavior