Re: [Mono-dev] mono 1.9

2008-02-20 Thread Scott Fluto
x27;s just an enhancement to the language which shipped (ironically enough) in .Net 3.5. :) Hope this helps! Jonathan Scott Fluto wrote: > hmm, so what I can gather then is that it will be pretty much 3.0 > complete but just partially 3.5 complete given 3.5 has a lot of base >

Re: [Mono-dev] mono 1.9

2008-02-20 Thread Scott Fluto
10:33 AM To: Jonathan Pobst Cc: Scott Fluto; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] mono 1.9 On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 09:11 -0600, Jonathan Pobst wrote: > I'm pretty sure the support is 0%. Although we have implemented some of > the 3.0 and 3.5 base class libraries, t

[Mono-dev] mono 1.9

2008-02-20 Thread Scott Fluto
I was wondering if anyone knows what percentage of support 1.9 has with regards to .net 3.0 and 3.5 , is there a place to see the percentage of method coverage it has or will have? thanks scott ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@li

Re: [Mono-dev] mono support

2008-01-16 Thread Scott Fluto
would give us mono support through our suse support agreement? scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miguel de Icaza Sent: January-15-08 1:39 PM To: Scott Fluto Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] mono support Hello

[Mono-dev] mono support

2008-01-15 Thread Scott Fluto
I was wondering if anyone knows of any companies that offers mono development consulting/support. We tried novell but found out they no longer are offering support for mono and will be taking that off the website and was told to look in the open source community for support so Im not sure , does an