On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Michael Barker wrote:
>> Thanks :) Though I have one request; they had better be made as virtual
>> in Mono.Messaging so that 1) those who derive from the driver do not
>> have to implement them by default, while 2) they can be implemented
>> in each driver's custo
Hello Michael,
Ugh, OK it does not seem to be quite simple as I originally guessed as
Mono.Messaging was interface based. But this would be better, so please
commit this change. Thanks.
(Sorry I'm in off mode and my replies will be belated.)
Atsushi Eno
Michael Barker wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2
