On Sunday 16 April 2006 05:24, Pablo Iñigo Blasco wrote:
Greetings folks,
A developer group looking for a platform to deploy theirs applications
wants: - Secure platform stable platform and dinamic(i think mono it is
enough, but it has to be proven, we can't do anything only the time
can)
-
Greetings folks,
A developer group looking for a platform to deploy theirs applications wants:
- Secure platform stable platform and dinamic(i think mono it is
enough, but it has to be proven, we can't do anything only the time
can)
- Modern abstract POO language (Mono supports the most
Web Page: http://elcarteldetux.blogspot.com
- Original Message -
From: Andrés G. Aragoneses [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 4:23 AM
Subject: [Mono-dev] Re: What would you like to see in Mono?
Miguel de Icaza escribió:
Hey
Miguel de Icaza escribió:
Hey,
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
Think of a feature that is not something we are currently working
on (we know about those), for example avoid saying: a class-is-missing
feature or IDE or the debugger. We know about those.
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 16:50 +0200, Joachim Ante wrote:
So will such a configure variable be added?
Or will MONO_DISABLE_SHM be reintroduced?
Yes
- Dick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Mono-devel-list mailing
Hi,
So will such a configure variable be added?
Or will MONO_DISABLE_SHM be reintroduced?
I've had several people complaining about that our web player creates
folders in the home directory.
Joachim Ante
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
One problem with this: none of it is standardized. Red Hat will differ
from SuSE will differ from Debian will differ from...
Sure - but surely you define an interface, and the environment can
define a localised implementation for your flavour of UNIX.
Hopefully this would not be Linux specific,
Maxime de Lavenne wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of James Mansion
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:28 AM
To: Jonathan Pryor
Cc: Dave Cramer; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: RE: [Mono-dev] Re: What would you like to see
Joachim Ante wrote:
Hello,
What i'd like to see in mono is the ability to start up an application
without it needing a .WAPI folder. I understand why mono needs the wapi
folder, but i'm sure there are application for which one wouldn't need one
at all.
Yeah that would really useful.
For
On 3/30/06, Jonathan Pryor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 12:58 +0530, Sharique uddin Ahmed Farooqui wrote:
I want to see a system wide api in Mono (sonthing like System.linux or
linux.system). By using this u can handle any kind of stuff on linux.
Rudimentary support for
System.Windows.Automation!!!
This way we could implement multi platform GUI based automated testing
system!!! Imagine standard open tests for our applications running in
multiple platforms!!! Would be great!
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Jonathan Pryor wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 12:58 +0530, Sharique uddin Ahmed Farooqui wrote:
I want to see a system wide api in Mono (sonthing like System.linux or
linux.system). By using this u can handle any kind of stuff on linux.
Rudimentary support for this exists in Mono.Unix and
12 matches
Mail list logo
