Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-18 Thread Sharique uddin Ahmed Farooqui
I believe we must concentrate on *nixes than windows, because Microsoft.net and ShapDevelop is already there and there r many IDEs r there, which r more powerful than MonoDevelop.As much as I know main objective of mono project is to make a  high quality next generation IDE for *nixes and an equiva

Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-17 Thread Michael Schurter
Piotr Zurek wrote: > Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: > >> My personal opinion is that the best priority should be to finish the >> port of MonoDevelop to Windows. > > Instead of porting things back and forth (MD was started as SharpDevelop > port) it would be just great if the contributi

Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-17 Thread Piotr Zurek
Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: > My personal opinion is that the best priority should be to finish the > port of MonoDevelop to Windows. Instead of porting things back and forth (MD was started as SharpDevelop port) it would be just great if the contribution would make our life easier.

Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-17 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, > My personal opinion is that the best priority should be to finish the > port of MonoDevelop to Windows. I think this goal would make Mono take > off on many fields (nowadays, it is very difficult to convince people > about using a multiplatform development tool whose own IDE is not >

Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-17 Thread Marek Sieradzki
On pon, 2006-07-17 at 15:01 -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: > > Martin Hinks escribió: > >> My main gripe with MonoDevelop is that the official IDE > >> for cross-platform .NET is not cross-platform. > > > > Yes, that's the same thing I claimed when I wrote "

Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-17 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: > Martin Hinks escribió: >> My main gripe with MonoDevelop is that the official IDE >> for cross-platform .NET is not cross-platform. > > Yes, that's the same thing I claimed when I wrote "nowadays, it is very > difficult to convince people about using a mul

Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-17 Thread John Luke
Hello, On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 15:33 +0200, "Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]" wrote: > Martin Hinks escribió: > > My main gripe with MonoDevelop is that the official IDE > > for cross-platform .NET is not cross-platform. > > Yes, that's the same thing I claimed when I wrote "nowadays, it is very >

Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-17 Thread Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]
Martin Hinks escribió: > My main gripe with MonoDevelop is that the official IDE > for cross-platform .NET is not cross-platform. Yes, that's the same thing I claimed when I wrote "nowadays, it is very difficult to convince people about using a multiplatform development tool whose own IDE is not

Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-17 Thread Martin Hinks
Oh, maybe I made a rash assumption - I assumed it was a gtk with Windows thing. My main gripe with MonoDevelop is that the official IDE for cross-platform .NET is not cross-platform. Martin On 7/17/06, "Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Hinks escribió: > > My 2

Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-17 Thread Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]
Martin Hinks escribió: > My 2 cents would be to get SWF to a good state and then port > MonoDevelop to that so that it can be cross platform rather than > wasting time porting it Port MonoDevelop to SWF? If you want that kind of IDE, use SharpDevelop. Besides, AFAIK the issues about porting M

Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-17 Thread Martin Hinks
My 2 cents would be to get SWF to a good state and then port MonoDevelop to that so that it can be cross platform rather than wasting time porting it Martin On 7/17/06, Ivan N. Zlatev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/17/06, "Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My

Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-17 Thread Ivan N. Zlatev
On 7/17/06, "Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My personal opinion is that the best priority should be to finish the > port of MonoDevelop to Windows. I think this goal would make Mono take > off on many fields (nowadays, it is very difficult to convince people > about u

Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-17 Thread Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]
ahmad faheem escribió: > i'm ahmed faheem, a final year student, Computer & Systems Engineering > Dept, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandraia Univ., Egypt. > my final project team wants to contribute to Mono Project. We are a set > of self-motivated people who are very enthusiastic to build a good

Re: [Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-16 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, > > my final project team wants to contribute to Mono Project. We are a > set of self-motivated people who are very enthusiastic to build a good > thing in our final project. So, we want suggestions on how we can > contribute. We are ready for a big contribution, one that will affect > Mon

[Mono-dev] We want to contribute

2006-07-16 Thread ahmad faheem
Hi i'm ahmed faheem, a final year student, Computer & Systems Engineering Dept, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandraia Univ., Egypt. my final project team wants to contribute to Mono Project. We are a set of self-motivated people who are very enthusiastic to build a good thing in our final project.