Hello,
I'm currently working on a project for which I would wish to reuse MonoDoc
as
a web-based documentation generator/browser. On the Mono site, I've read
that
"In the future we will have an ASP.NET front-end to present the
documentation
on the web as well". Is anyone doing active developmen
Hello,
I've gotten a web based monodoc to work, if anyone is interested
you can try it out.
It requires a patch to browser.cs and Makefile.am, I'm including
diffs against the current sources. It also requires a new xsl file
(mono-hrefreplace.xsl), that you'll find attached.
I've also included a
Hello,
> "In the future we will have an ASP.NET front-end to present the
> documentation
> on the web as well". Is anyone doing active development on that front? Does
> anyone have a plan, or even just quick notes on what's required to achieve
> this?
Nobody is working on this right now.
> Is
Philippe Desaulniers wrote:
I've gotten a web based monodoc to work, if anyone is interested
you can try it out.
Looks very cool.
Rather than hacking browser.cs, it might be easier to just apply the XSL
transform in your own perl script. (Capture the result of "monodoc
--html T:Whatever" to a s
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 21:36, Philippe Desaulniers wrote:
> I'm willing to commit it to the tree, just let me know if I'm breaking any project
> code formatting rules, I'll make fixes beforehand.
This code looks sweet! I am helping with the new ASPX Mono website, and
doing this in c# (which would no
Hello!
> I've gotten a web based monodoc to work, if anyone is interested
> you can try it out.
>
> It requires a patch to browser.cs and Makefile.am, I'm including
> diffs against the current sources. It also requires a new xsl file
> (mono-hrefreplace.xsl), that you'll find attached.
>
> I've
Hello,
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 12:46, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> I want to join everyone who has congratulated you on this hack. It is
> really nice.
Thanks.
> I would love to host this on mono.ximian.com, but I have never written
> cgi web pages, and I would love someone with cgi experience to exp
> To alleviate increasing the complexity in browser.cs, I propose adding
> a separate class to generate www output.
Two other possibilities:
Pipe the output of monodoc to xsltproc. This has the advantages of
keeping everything out of browser.cs and not having any extra
dependencies (xsltproc sh
